CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 118Psychological Testing and AssessmentPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires?

Martin, B.A, Bowen, C.-C, Hunt, S.T·2002·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00021-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00021-6

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Stanush, P. L. (1997). Factors that influence the susceptibility of self-report inventories to distortion: a meta-analytic investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A, & M University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 118

Related

Metadata

Authors
Martin, B. A., Bowen, C.-C., & Hunt, S. T.
Affiliations
  • John Carroll University (US)
  • Cleveland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Martin, B.A
ORCID
Hunt, S.T
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
247-256
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00021-6
OpenAlex
W2041313426
Cited by
117
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
faking, personality tests, person-job fit, HR professionals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review