The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relationship between extraversion and ability
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies published since Ackerman and Heggestad's meta-analysis suggest a negative relationship between extraversion and intelligence.
“Several studies (Ackerman, 2000; Ackerman, Bowen, Beier, & Kanfer, 2001; Ackerman & Rolfhus, 1999; Furnham, Forde, & Cotter, 1998; Roberts, 2002; Rolfhus & Ackerman, 1999) since the meta-analysis suggest the opposite trend – a negative relationship between extraversion and intelligence.”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Roberts, 2002
Roberts (2002) found a significant linear trend in which introverts outscored extraverts on the verbal test, F(1, 206) = 7.42, p < .01.
“He found a significant linear trend in which introverts outscored extraverts on the verbal test, $F(1, 206) = 7.42$, $p < .01$”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Roberts, 2002
Roberts (2002) found a similar nonsignificant trend on the spatial test, F(1, 206) = 1.93.
“and a similar nonsignificant trend on the spatial test, $F(1, 206) = 1.93$.”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Roberts, 2002
The relationship between extraversion and intelligence may be importantly moderated by the measures used to assess each construct.
“Thus, the relationship between extraversion and intelligence may be importantly moderated by the measures used to assess each construct (Roberts, 2002; Zeidner & Matthews, 2000).”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Roberts, 2002
Past research has demonstrated the complicated nature of the relationship between different measures of extraversion and different measures of intelligence.
“Past research has demonstrated the complicated nature of the relationship between different measures of extraversion and different measures of intelligence (Roberts, 2002; Zeidner & Matthews, 2000; Zeidner, 1995).”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Roberts, 2002
Citations
Cites
Jensen, A. R. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381729b0 · Cited by 674
The origins of exceptional abilities
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-1186 · Cited by 137
Schmidt, F. L., Öneş, D. S., & Hunter, J. E. (1992) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.003211 · Cited by 124
The neurophysiological bases of high IQ
Robinson, D. L. (1989) · International Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.3109/00207458908986260 · Cited by 45
The relationship between intelligence, personality and inspection time
Stough, C., Brebner, J., Nettelbeck, T., Cooper, C. J., Bates, T., & Mangan, G. L. (1996) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02589.x · Cited by 39
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation
Wolf, M. B., & Ackerman, P. L. (2005) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.020 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Essex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Roberts, Maxwell J
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 517-522
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010257964
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
- Keywords
- extraversion, ambiversion, intelligence, verbal ability, spatial ability, quadratic relationship, intelligence test scores, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
