Cited by 264Personality Traits and PsychologyCognitive Abilities and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Personality and intelligence

Furnham, Adrian, Forde, Liam, Cotter, Tim·1998·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00169-4

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several subsequent studies by Ackerman and his colleagues, Furnham et al. (1998), and Roberts (2002) found significant negative relationships between extraversion and intelligence.

    “Several subsequent studies by Ackerman and his colleagues (Ackerman, 2000; Ackerman et al., 2001; Ackerman & Rolfhus, 1999; Rolfhus & Ackerman, 1999), Furnham et al. (1998), and Roberts (2002) found significant negative relationships between extraversion and intelligence.”

    From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Furnham et al., 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Furnham, A., Forde, L., & Cotter, T.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Furnham, Adrian
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-02
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
187-192
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993986516
Cited by
264
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
stability, introversion, psychoticism, Wonderlic Personnel Test, sentence verification, response latency, intelligence prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review