CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 184Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blood-injection-injury phobia and fear of spiders: Domain specific individual differences in disgust sensitivity

de Jong, Peter J., Merckelbach, Harald·1998·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00178-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00178-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are indications that BII-phobia patients have a heightened disgust sensitivity in specific domains, such as body envelope violations, contamination, or death, although studies are not consistent.

    “There are also indications that BII-phobia patients have a heightened disgust sensitivity in specific domains, such as body envelope violations, contamination, or death (e.g., de Jong & Merckelbach, 1998; Sawchuk et al., 2000; Tolin et al., 1997), although studies are not consistent (see also Sawchuk et al., 2002).”

    From The psychophysiology of blood-injection-injury phobia: Looking beyond the diphasic response paradigm (2010) · cites this paper as de Jong & Merckelbach, 1998

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Davey, 1992, Characteristics of individuals with fear of spiders, Anxiety Research, 4, 299, 10.1080/08917779208248798 · DOI
  2. Davey, 1994, Self-reported fears to common indigenous animals in an adult UK. population: The role of disgust sensitivity, British Journal of Psychology, 85, 541, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02540.x · DOI
  3. Haidt, 1994, Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors, Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701, 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hennig, 1996, Sensitivity to disgust as an indication of neuroticism: A psychobiological approach, Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 589, 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00218-9 · DOI
  5. de Jong, 1997, Spider phobia in children: Disgust and fear before and after treatment, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 559, 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00002-8 · DOI
  6. Kleinknecht, 1996, Factorial dimensions and correlates of blood, injection, and related medical fear: Cross validation of the medical fear survey, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 323, 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00072-0 · DOI
  7. Klorman, 1974, Psychometric description of some specific fear questionnaires, Behavior Therapy, 5, 401, 10.1016/S0005-7894(74)80008-0 · DOI
  8. Levenson, 1992, Autonomie nervous system differences among emotions, Psychological Science, 3, 23, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00251.x · DOI
  9. Marks, 1979, Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 17, 263, 10.1016/0005-7967(79)90041-X · DOI · Paper page
  10. Matchett, 1991, A test of a disease-avoidance model of animal phobias, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 91, 10.1016/S0005-7967(09)80011-9 · DOI
  11. Merckelbach, 1993, The role of evaluative learning and disgust sensitivity in the etiology and treatment of spider phobia, Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15, 243, 10.1016/0146-6402(93)90011-P · DOI
  12. Mulkens, 1996, Disgust and spider phobia, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 464, 10.1037/0021-843X.105.3.464 · DOI
  13. Page, 1994, Blood-injury phobia, Clinical Psychology Review, 14, 443, 10.1016/0272-7358(94)90036-1 · DOI
  14. Rozin, 1987, A perspective on disgust, Psychological Review, 94, 23, 10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.23 · DOI
  15. Rozin, 1984, Family resemblance in attitudes to food, Developmental Psychology, 20, 309, 10.1037/0012-1649.20.2.309 · DOI
  16. Tucker, 1997, The roles of gender, sex role, and disgust in fear of animals, Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 135, 10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00168-7 · DOI
  17. Wolpe, 1964, A fear survey schedule for use in behaviour therapy, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2, 27, 10.1016/0005-7967(64)90051-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
de Jong, P. J., & Merckelbach, H.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
de Jong, Peter J.
ORCID
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-02
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
153-158
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00178-5
OpenAlex
W2139670759
Cited by
184
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
disgust sensitivity, blood-injection-injury phobia, spider phobia, domain specificity, individual differences, phobic fear

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review