Cited by 294Personality Traits and PsychologyMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsPhysical Activity and Health

Personality correlates of exercise behavior, motives, barriers and preferences: An application of the five-factor model

Courneya, Kerry S., Hellsten, Laurie-Ann M.·1998·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00231-6

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Courneya, K. S., & Hellsten, L.-A. M.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Courneya, Kerry S.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-05
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
625-633
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029914530
Cited by
294
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
exercise behavior, personality, Big Five personality traits, exercise motivation, barriers to exercise, exercise preferences, extraversion, conscientiousness, neuroticism, leisure-time exercise, health behavior determinants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review