Cited by 67Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPersonality Traits and PsychologySexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Compulsive smartphone usage and users' ill-being among young Indians: Does personality matter?

Panda, Abinash, Jain, Nikunj Kumar·2018·Telematics and Informatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.006

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 136 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panda, A., & Jain, N. K.
Affiliations
  • Management Development Institute (IN)
  • International Management Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
Jain, Nikunj Kumar
Venue
Telematics and Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
1355-1372
ISSN
0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793533041
Cited by
67
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
13.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
compulsive smartphone use, smartphone addiction, personality traits, Big Five personality traits, extraversion, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness to experience, agreeableness, emotional well-being, physical health, sleep quality, young adults, Indian youth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review