Cited by 184Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac Health and Mental Health

Impact of rate versus rhythm control on quality of life in patients with persistent atrial fibrillationResults from a prospective randomized study

GRONEFELD, G·2003·European Heart Journal

Abstract

Aims Despite the high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), there are only limited data on quality of life (QoL) stemming from prospective trials comparing rate versus rhythm control. This prospective study evaluated QoL in patients with symptomatic persistent AF randomized to therapy aiming at rate versus rhythm control. Methods and results Patients with symptomatic persistent AF (7 to 360 days duration) were prospectively randomized to ventricular rate control (n=125) or to cardioversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm (n=127). QoL was assessed by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form health survey (SF-36) at baseline and during 1 year of follow-up. Changes in QoL were compared on an intent-to-treat basis, and subsequently between patients in sinus rhythm versus AF. At baseline, all SF-36 scales were reduced compared to healthy controls. At 1 year, six of eight items had improved significantly in patients assigned to rate control, and five of eight items on rhythm control (p=ns). The physical component summary showed a comparable increase with both treatment strategies (rate control: p=0.004; rhythm control: p Conclusion In patients with symptomatic persistent AF, the two treatment strategies of rate versus rhythm control are associated with similar improvements in QoL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00261-6

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GRONEFELD, G.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2003-08
Volume
24
Issue
15
Pages
1430-1436
ISSN
0195-668X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129290969
Cited by
184
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
persistent atrial fibrillation, quality of life, rate control, rhythm control, cardioversion, sinus rhythm maintenance, SF-36, physical and mental health, health-related quality of life
MeSH terms
Amiodarone, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Electric Countershock, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review