Cited by 627Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Health and Mental HealthHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

The impairment of health-related quality of life in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation: implications for the assessment of investigational therapy

Open access
Dorian, Paul, Jung, Werner, Newman, David, Paquette, Miney, Wood, Kathryn, Ayers, Gregory M, Camm, John, Akhtar, Masood +1 more·2000·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives We sought to assess the impact of intermittent atrial fibrillation (AF) on health-related quality of life (QoL).Background Intermittent AF is a common condition with little data on health-related QoL questionnaires to guide investigational therapies.Methods Outpatients from four centers, with documented AF (n = 152), completed validated QoL questionnaires (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 [SF-36], Specific Activity, Symptom Checklist, Illness Intrusiveness and University of Toronto AF Severity Scales). Comparison groups were made up of healthy individuals (n = 47) and four cardiac control groups: published (n = 78) and created for study (n = 69) percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA); published heart failure (n = 216) and published postmyocardial infarction (MI) (n = 107).Results Across all domains of the SF-36, AF patients reported substantially worse QoL than healthy controls (1.3 to 2.0 standard deviation units), with scores of 24%, 23%, 16% and 30% lower than healthy individuals on measures of physical and social functioning, mental and general health, respectively (all p < 0.001). Patients with AF were either significantly worse (p < 0.05, published controls) or as impaired (study controls) as either PTCA or post-MI patients on all domains of the SF-36 and the same as heart failure controls on SF-36 psychological subscales. Patients with AF were as impaired or worse than study PTCA controls on measures of illness intrusiveness, activity limitations and symptoms. Associations between objective disease indexes and subjective QoL measures had poor correlations and accounted for <6% of the total variability in QoL scores.Conclusions Quality of life is as impaired in patients with intermittent AF as in patients with significant structural heart disease. Patients' perception of QoL is not dependent on the objective measures of disease severity that are usually employed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00886-x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with AF have significantly poorer quality of life than healthy controls.

    “Patients with AF have significantly poorer quality of life than healthy controls, experiencing a variety of symptoms including lethargy, palpitations, dyspnoea, chest tightness, sleeping difficulties, and psychosocial distress.”
  • Patients with AF experience symptoms including lethargy, palpitations, dyspnoea, chest tightness, sleeping difficulties, and psychosocial distress.

    “Patients with AF have significantly poorer quality of life than healthy controls, experiencing a variety of symptoms including lethargy, palpitations, dyspnoea, chest tightness, sleeping difficulties, and psychosocial distress.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Maglio C, Sra J, Paquette M, et al. Measuring quality of life and symptom severity in patients with atrial fibrillation (abstr). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:839.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dorian, P., Jung, W., Newman, D., Paquette, M., Wood, K., Ayers, G. M., Camm, J., Akhtar, M., & Luderitz, B.
Affiliations
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • University Hospital Bonn (DE)
  • Medtronic (United States) (US)
  • St. Luke's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Newman, David
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-10
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
1303-1309
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969667526
Cited by
627
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 37
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
intermittent atrial fibrillation, health-related quality of life, SF-36, illness intrusiveness, disease severity, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, heart failure, post-myocardial infarction, activity limitation, symptom burden
MeSH terms
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Electric Countershock, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review