Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Should We Adjust for Covariates in Nonlinear Regression Analyses of Randomized Trials?

Hauck, Walter W., Anderson, Sharon, Marcus, Sue M.·1998·Controlled Clinical Trials

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00147-5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Gail, 1984, Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariates, Biometrika, 71, 431, 10.1093/biomet/71.3.431 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hauck, 1991, A consequence of omitted covariates when estimating odds ratios, J Clin Epidemiol, 44, 77, 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90203-L · DOI
  3. Lagakos, 1984, Properties of proportional-hazards score tests under misspecified regression models, Biometrics, 40, 1037, 10.2307/2531154 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Gail, 1988, The effect of pooling across strata in perfectly balanced studies, Biometrics, 44, 151, 10.2307/2531903 · DOI
  5. Struthers, 1986, Misspecified proportional hazard models, Biometrika, 73, 363, 10.1093/biomet/73.2.363 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Schumacher, 1987, The impact of heterogeneity on the comparison of survival times, Stat Med, 6, 773, 10.1002/sim.4780060708 · DOI
  7. Bretagnolle, 1988, Effects of omitting covariates in Cox’s model for survival data, Scand J Stat, 15, 125
  8. Brännäs, 1986, Small sample properties of the likelihood estimator in proportional hazard regression models with omitted covariates, Biomet J, 28, 219, 10.1002/bimj.4710280214 · doi:10.1002/bimj.4710280214
  9. Chastang, 1988, A quantitative study of the bias in estimating the treatment effect cause by omitting a balanced covariate in survival models, Stat Med, 7, 1243, 10.1002/sim.4780071205 · DOI
  10. Robinson, 1991, Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models, Int Stat Rev, 58, 227, 10.2307/1403444 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Begg, 1993, Loss in efficiency caused by omitting covariates and misspecifying exposure in logistic regression models, J Am Stat Assoc, 88, 166, 10.2307/2290710 · DOI
  12. Morgan, 1986, Omitting covariates from the proportional hazards model, Biometrics, 42, 993, 10.2307/2530716 · DOI
  13. Akazawa, 1997, Power of logrank test and Cox regression model in clinical trials with heterogeneous samples, Stat Med, 16, 583, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970315)16:5<583::AID-SIM433>3.0.CO;2-Z · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970315)16:5<583::aid-sim433>3.0.co;2-z
  14. Beach, 1989, Choosing covariates in the analysis of clinical trials, Controlled Clin Trials, 10, 161S, 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90055-X · DOI
  15. Meier, 1985, A controlled trial of extended radical mastectomy, Cancer, 55, 880, 10.1002/1097-0142(19850215)55:4<880::AID-CNCR2820550429>3.0.CO;2-4 · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19850215)55:4<880::aid-cncr2820550429>3.0.co;2-4
  16. Neuhaus, 1991, A comparison of cluster-specific and population-averaged approaches for analyzing correlated binary data, Int Stat Rev, 59, 25, 10.2307/1403572 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Zeger, 1988, Models for longitudinal data, Biometrics, 44, 1049, 10.2307/2531734 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Yusuf, 1984, Why do we need large, simple randomized trials?, Stat Med, 3, 409, 10.1002/sim.4780030421 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. San Diego: Academic Press; Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich; 1985.
  20. Anello, 1995, Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis, J Clin Epidemiol, 48, 109, 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00084-4 · DOI
  21. Ford, 1995, Model inconsistency, illustrated by the Cox proportional hazards model, Stat Med, 14, 735, 10.1002/sim.4780140804 · DOI
  22. Senn, 1989, Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trials, Stat Med, 8, 467, 10.1002/sim.4780080410 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lynch, 1996, Statistical issues in biologics submissions to the FDA, Drug Info J, 30, 921, 10.1177/009286159603000408 · DOI
  24. Altman, 1985, Comparability of randomized groups, Statistician, 34, 125, 10.2307/2987510 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Sather, 1986, The use of prognostic factors in clinical trials, Cancer, 58, 461, 10.1002/1097-0142(19860715)58:2+<461::AID-CNCR2820581309>3.0.CO;2-L · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19860715)58:2+<461::aid-cncr2820581309>3.0.co;2-l
  26. Cochran, 1965, The planning of observational studies of human populations (with discussion), J Roy Stat Soc, Ser A, 128, 134, 10.2307/2344179 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Schluchter, 1985, Post-hoc selection of covariates in randomized experiments, Commun Stat—Theor Meth, 14, 679, 10.1080/03610928508828942 · DOI
  28. Flack, 1987, Frequency of selecting noise variables in subset regression analysis, Am Stat, 41, 84, 10.2307/2684336 · doi:10.2307/2684336
  29. Zhang, 1992, Inference after variable selection in linear regression models, Biometrika, 79, 741, 10.1093/biomet/79.4.741 · DOI
  30. Neuhaus, 1993, A geometric approach to assess bias due to omitted covariates in generalized linear models, Biometrika, 80, 807, 10.1093/biomet/80.4.807 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Hauck, W. W., Anderson, S., & Marcus, S. M.
Venue
Controlled Clinical Trials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-06
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
249-256
ISSN
0197-2456 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966428349
Cited by
218
References
3
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Should We Adjust for Covariates in Nonlinear Regression Analyses of Randomized Trials? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00147-5
The paper
Hauck, W. W., Anderson, S., & Marcus, S. M. (1998). Should We Adjust for Covariates in Nonlinear Regression Analyses of Randomized Trials? Controlled Clinical Trials. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00147-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.