Cited by 14Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Screening of two mutations at exon 3 of the apolipoprotein E gene (sites 28 and 42) in a sample of patients with sporadic late-onset Alzheimer's disease

Scacchi, R, Gambina, G, Ferrari, G, Corbo, R.M·2003·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

The search for further variation at the APOE gene in a sample of patients with sporadic late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related controls revealed two different mutations in the exon 3 of the gene. One, the Leu28-->Pro, always found on an APOE e(*)4 allele, was present in five of the 94 patients and in 1 of the 157 controls. The other, Thr42-->Ala, found on an e(*)3 allele, was observed in only one AD patient, who also carried the Leu28-->Pro, but in none of the controls. In the AD patient group the allele e(*)4(-), corresponding to Leu28-->Pro, showed a frequency of 0.027, compared with only 0.003 in the controls. Compared to E3/3 and E3/2 genotypes, the risk of developing AD associated with the genotypes carrying the e(*)4 allele, the well-established risk allele for AD onset, was observed to be high (OR=3.16; 95% CI=1.62-6.20; P=0.0009), but the risk associated with genotypes carrying the Leu28-->Pro mutation was higher still (OR=10.95; 95% CI=1.25-95.75; P=0.015). The higher risk associated with this mutation was assessed by meta-analysis carried out using the data of three patient groups from a previously published study Kamboh et al. and from our study. The results indicated that, compared with all the other APOE genotypes, those carrying the Leu28-->Pro mutation were at a substantially higher risk of developing AD (OR=4.25; 95% CI=1.21-14.97).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00089-1

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scacchi, R., Gambina, G., Ferrari, G., & Corbo, R. M.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
339-343
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104722278
Cited by
14
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, late-onset Alzheimer's disease, sporadic Alzheimer's disease, APOE ε4, genetic risk, APOE genotype
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Exons, Gene Frequency, Genetic Testing, Genotype, Humans, Risk Factors, Point Mutation, Age of Onset, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review