Cited by 46Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPatient Satisfaction in HealthcareMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Continuity of carer and satisfaction

Waldenström, Ulla·1998·Midwifery

Abstract

Objective To study the association between continuity of carer and satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum domiciliary care.Design A descriptive study comparing satisfaction measures between women cared for by a known or unknown midwife. Data on satisfaction were extracted from the intervention group of a birth centre trial, and the names of the individual carers from two clinical databases kept at the birth centre.Setting An in-hospital birth centre in Stockholm.Subjects 410 women who had been randomly allocated to birth centre care during pregnancy, and who had a normal vaginal delivery at the centre. Complete data, including the names of the caregivers and the women's satisfaction scores, were available in 175 cases (43%) during the antenatal episode, 404 cases (98%) during the intrapartum episode and in 254 cases (62%) during the episode of postpartum domiciliary care.Main outcome measures Overall satisfaction with antenatal care, intrapartum care, labour and birth, and postpartum domiciliary care.Findings No statistical differences were observed in satisfaction with antenatal care between women who had seen only one, two, or more than two midwives at their check-ups during pregnancy; in satisfaction with intrapartum care or the birth itself when comparing women who were delivered by a known or unknown midwife; or in satisfaction with domiciliary care when the midwife was known or unknown.Conclusion The findings suggest that continuity of carer is less important in a birth centre. The high levels of satisfaction in women having birth centre care were probably more affected by the attitudes of the carers, the philosophy of care, and the nice and calm environment than by knowing the individual midwife well.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0266-6138(98)90092-4

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waldenström, U.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Waldenström, Ulla
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-12
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
207-213
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977148127
Cited by
46
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 6
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
continuity of carer, patient satisfaction, midwives, prenatal care, intrapartum care, normal delivery, midwifery care
MeSH terms
Adult, Continuity of Patient Care, Delivery Rooms, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Midwifery, Nurse Midwives, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden, Nursing Evaluation Research, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review