The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of purchasing integration and practices on manufacturing performance
Abstract
Purchasing integration remains an under‐researched concept, despite being described as a key competence in the literature. This study explicates the concept of purchasing integration and examines its relationships with purchasing practices and manufacturing performance. Purchasing integration refers to the integration of strategic purchasing practices and goals with a firm’s objectives. Alternative models linking purchasing integration to purchasing practices and manufacturing performance are hypothesized and tested using empirical data. Purchasing integration was found to moderate the relationship between purchasing practices and manufacturing performance. Increased investments in purchasing integration were observed to lead to higher performance returns from investments in purchasing practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 · Cited by 4,774
Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B. (1984) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250050306 · Cited by 3,337
Cited by
Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance
Chen, I. J., Paulraj, A., & Lado, A. A. (2004) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.06.002 · Cited by 940
BUYER–SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS: DERIVED VALUE OVER TWO DECADES
TERPEND, R., TYLER, B. B., KRAUSE, D. R., & HANDFIELD, R. B. (2008) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2008.00053.x · Cited by 300
Impact of e-procurement: Experiences from implementation in the UK public sector
Croom, S., & Brandon-Jones, A. (2007) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2007.09.015 · Cited by 239
Internal lean practices and performance: The role of technological turbulence
Chavez, R., Yu, W., Jacobs, M., Fynes, B., Wiengarten, F., & Lecuna, A. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.005 · Cited by 200
A contextual analysis of the impact of strategic sourcing and E-procurement on performance
Kim, M., Suresh, N. C., & Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, C. (2015) · Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-01-2012-0010 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Narasimhan, R., & Das, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08-22
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 593-609
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2077891291
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of purchasing integration and practices on manufacturing performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0272-6963(01)00055-9
- The paper
- Narasimhan, R., & Das, A. (2001). The impact of purchasing integration and practices on manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(01)00055-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
