CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 135Reproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Health and ContraceptionPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What do women want? Women's experiences of infertility treatment

Malin, Maili, Hemminki, Elina, Räikkönen, Outi, Sihvo, Sinikka, Perälä, M-L·2001·Social Science & Medicine
DOI 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00317-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Finnish women's experiences of infertility treatment were investigated by examining their satisfaction and dissatisfaction, and their most positive and negative experiences with the treatment. Three hundred and forty four (16%) out of the 2,189 women respondents to a 1994 postal survey (response rate 74%) had experienced difficulties in having a baby. Two-thirds had sought medical help, generally from private gynaecologists. Less than half of the women were satisfied with the infertility treatment, expressing less satisfaction than is generally found among health care clients. Dissatisfied women were more often 35-39 years of age, in treatment during the study period, in treatment in public clinics and not successful in having a baby. However, about one-third of the women were unsure about or did not give their opinion in regard to satisfaction. The subsequent birth of a baby was the most common reason for satisfaction. The most positive treatment experience was respectful, empathic and personal care from the doctor. Unsatisfactory encounters with health care personnel were the main reasons for dissatisfaction and were most often cited as the most negative treatment experience. This dissatisfaction could reflect relatively young and healthy women's assertive attitudes toward infertility care services in the context of the intimacy and vulnerability of childlessness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00317-8

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Beck-Gersheim, E. (1989). From the pill to test-tube babies, new options, new pressures in reproductive behaviour. In K. Strother Ratcliff, et al. (Eds.), Healing technology. Feminist perspectives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  2. Saario, P. (1997). Lapsettomat kaipaavat kokonaisvaltaisempaa hoitoa - Lapsettomien tuki ry:n jäsenkyselyn tuloksia. In Ritamo, & Kautto (Eds.), Näkökulmia hedelmöityshoitoihin. Stakes, Aiheita no. 49, (pp. 27–28).
  3. de Witt, 1991, Diffusion of IVF in the Netherlands and England, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Car, 7, 574
  4. Williams, S. J. & Calnan, M. (1996). Modern medicine and the lay populace: theoretical perspectives and methodological issues. In S. J. Williams, & M. Calnan (Eds.) Modern Medicine. Lay perspectives and experiences. London UCL Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Malin, M., Hemminki, E., Räikkönen, O., Sihvo, S., & Perälä, M.-L.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Malin, Maili
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-07
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
123-133
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00317-8
OpenAlex
W1982964761
Cited by
135
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
infertility treatment, patient satisfaction, patient dissatisfaction, women's experiences, physician-patient relationship, empathy in care, childlessness, reproductive health care, Finnish women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Data Collection, Female, Fertility Agents, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Finland, Patient Care, Humans, Infertility, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review