The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A conceptual model of the food and nutrition system
Open accessAbstract
The food system is a widely used concept, but few systematic frameworks model the full scope and structure of the food and nutrition system. Bibliographic searches, a modified Delphi technique, focus groups and interviews with experts on the topic were conducted to identify existing models of agriculture, food, nutrition, health and environmental systems. These models were examined, classified and synthesized into an integrated conceptual model of the food and nutrition system. Few existing models broadly described the system and most focused on one disciplinary perspective or one segment of the system. Four major types of models were identified: food chains, food cycles, food webs and food contexts. The integrated model developed here included three subsystems (producer, consumer, nutrition) and nine stages (production, processing, distribution, acquisition, preparation, consumption, digestion, transport, metabolism). The integrated model considers the processes and transformations that occur within the system and relationships between the system and other systems in the biophysical and social environments. The integrated conceptual model of the food and nutrition system presents food and nutrition activities as part of a larger context and identifies linkages among the many disciplines that deal with the food and nutrition system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Kahle, J. B. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173469 · Cited by 5,199
The Agricultural Systems of the World: An Evolutionary Approach
Grigg, D. B. (1974) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665882 · Cited by 248 · cited 1×
“Many types of food production exist (Whittlesey, 1936; Grigg, 1969, 1974, 1995; Turner and Brush, 1987).”
Background
Cited by
Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research
Ericksen, P. J. (2008) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.002 · Cited by 1,486
Why are agri-food systems resistant to new directions of change? A systematic review
Conti, C., Zanello, G., & Hall, A. (2021) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100576 · Cited by 169
Luckett, B. G., DeClerck, F. A., Fanzo, J., Mundorf, A. R., & Rose, D. (2015) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s136898001500169x · Cited by 88
Cultural comparison research designs in food, eating, and nutrition
Sobal, J. (1998) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(98)00029-9 · Cited by 76
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sobal, J., Kettel Khan, L., & Bisogni, C.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 853-863
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003282570
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.