Cited by 88Child Nutrition and Water AccessAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics

Application of the nutrition functional diversity indicator to assess food system contributions to dietary diversity and sustainable diets of Malawian households

Open access
Luckett, Brian G, DeClerck, Fabrice AJ, Fanzo, Jessica, Mundorf, Adrienne R, Rose, Donald·2015·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Dietary diversity is associated with nutrient adequacy and positive health outcomes but indicators to measure diversity have focused primarily on consumption, rather than sustainable provisioning of food. The Nutritional Functional Diversity score was developed by ecologists to describe the contribution of biodiversity to sustainable diets. We have employed this tool to estimate the relative contribution of home production and market purchases in providing nutritional diversity to agricultural households in Malawi and examine how food system provisioning varies by time, space and socio-economic conditions. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of nationally representative household consumption data to test the applicability of the Nutritional Functional Diversity score. SETTING: The data were collected between 2010 and 2011 across the country of Malawi. SUBJECTS: Households (n 11 814) from predominantly rural areas of Malawi. RESULTS: Nutritional Functional Diversity varied demographically, geographically and temporally. Nationally, purchased foods contributed more to household nutritional diversity than home produced foods (mean score=17·5 and 7·8, respectively). Households further from roads and population centres had lower overall diversity (P<0·01) and accessed relatively more of their diversity from home production than households closer to market centres (P<0·01). Nutritional diversity was lowest during the growing season when farmers plant and tend crops (P<0·01). CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis demonstrates that the Nutritional Functional Diversity score is an effective indicator for identifying populations with low nutritional diversity and the relative roles that markets, agricultural extension and home production play in achieving nutritional diversity. This information may be used by policy makers to plan agricultural and market-based interventions that support sustainable diets and local food systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s136898001500169x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Luckett et al. applied the nutritional functional diversity score to diets within the context of measuring the contribution of different food source outlets to diet diversity and without validating the nutritional adequacy of the measure.

    “Luckett et al. (20) applied the nutritional functional diversity score to diets, but within the context of measuring the contribution of different food source outlets to diet diversity and without validating the nutritional adequacy of the measure.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Remans R, Ahmed S, Herforth A et al. (2014) Ten principles towards healthy and sustainable food systems. UNSCN Working Paper. http://unscn.org/en/publications/nutrition- and-post-2015-agenda/ (In the Press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luckett, B. G., DeClerck, F. A., Fanzo, J., Mundorf, A. R., & Rose, D.
Affiliations
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Alliance Bioversity International - CIAT (IT)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Luckett, Brian G
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2015-06-01
Volume
18
Issue
13
Pages
2479-2487
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2159829731
Cited by
88
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Keywords
dietary diversity, sustainable diets, household food production, household food consumption, rural households, Malawi, market access, growing season, agricultural extension, local food systems
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Consumer Behavior, Diet, Family Characteristics, Female, Food Supply, Humans, Malawi, Male, Models, Biological, Nutrition Surveys, Patient Compliance, Rural Health, Seasons, Program Evaluation, Crops, Agricultural, Nutrition Policy, Biodiversity, Environmental Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review