Cited by 528Drug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsGastrointestinal motility and disordersPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Anatomical and physiological parameters affecting gastrointestinal absorption in humans and rats

DeSesso, J.M, Jacobson, C.F·2001·Food and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract

Anatomical and physiological parameters of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract dramatically affect the rate and extent of absorption of ingested compounds. These parameters must be considered by nutritionists, pharmacologists and toxicologists when describing or modeling absorption. Likewise, interspecies extrapolation (e.g. from rat to human) requires species-to-species comparison of these parameters. The present paper (1) describes the alimentary canal and the barrier to absorption; (2) relates the major sites of absorption; (3) compares the dimensions and surface areas of human and rat intestinal tracts; (4) discusses motility of the gut and transit times through regions of the alimentary canal; (5) explains how luminal contents are altered by physical, chemical and metabolic processes; and (6) describes the flow of blood and lymph from the GI tract to the systemic circulation, including the enterohepatic circulation. Despite strong morphological similarities between humans and rats at the microscopic level, gross anatomical differences in the relative absorptive surface areas provide a basis for concluding that the human GI tract is capable of absorbing materials faster and to a greater extent than that of the rat. Differences in the environment of the GI lumen of the two species make it possible to infer which substances are more likely to be present in a dissolved/non-ionized state for each species. Taken together, these differences may be of sufficient magnitude to alter the assessment of risks/benefits for a given compound when those risks/benefits are based on interspecies extrapolations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0278-6915(00)00136-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeSesso, J. M., & Jacobson, C. F.
Corresponding author
DeSesso, J.M
Venue
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
209-228
ISSN
0278-6915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022898836
Cited by
528
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 28
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Air Force Research Laboratory
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
gastrointestinal absorption, interspecies extrapolation, human-rat comparison, intestinal surface area, intestinal motility, gastrointestinal transit time, luminal contents, enterohepatic circulation, risk assessment
MeSH terms
Animals, Gastric Mucosa, Gastrointestinal Motility, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review