The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Error negativity on correct trials: a reexamination of available data
Abstract
The error negativity, an EEG wave observed when subjects commit an error in a choice reaction time (RT) task, is often considered as a sign of error detection. Recently, reports of Ne-like waves on correct responses did challenge this interpretation. It has been proposed, however, that these Ne-like waves result either from an artifactual contamination of response-locked activities by stimulus-locked ones, or from an implicit monitoring of the time elapsing during the RT. Our aim was to reprocess published data: (1) to compare the shape and amplitude of EMG-locked and stimulus-locked ERPs on correct trials, and (2) to compare the size of the EMG-locked Ne-like waves obtained on fast and slow trials. The results neither support the artifact hypothesis nor the RT monitoring one. Therefore, it seems that the Ne-like waves observed on correct trials do correspond to a Ne, which suggests that the Ne has a broader significance than just error detection.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Supporting this interpretation, also previous studies have related CRN amplitude variation to emotional processes (Luu, Collins, & Tucker, 2000;Vidal et al., 2000;Vidal et al., 2003).”
From Interplay of self-other distinction and cognitive control mechanisms in a social automatic imitation task: An ERP study (2021) · cites this paper as Vidal et al., 2003
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
A neural system for error detection and compensation
Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1993) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x · Cited by 2,862
Nunez, P. L., & Srinivasan, R. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195050387.001.0001 · Cited by 2,531
Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1991) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(91)90062-9 · Cited by 1,706
ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: A tutorial
Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Christ, S., & Hohnsbein, J. (2000) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00031-9 · Cited by 1,442
Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.3.1.17 · Cited by 1,250
Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks.
Rabbitt, P. (1966) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0022853 · Cited by 1,024
An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations
Hjorth, B. (1975) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(75)90056-5 · Cited by 1,014
Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication
McFarland, D. J., McCane, L. M., David, S. V., & Wolpaw, J. R. (1997) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00022-2 · Cited by 937
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Johnson, 1997, Am I too late? The neural consequences of missing a deadline, Psychophysiology, 34, S48
- Pailing, 2000, Speed of responding and the likelihood of error-like activity in correct trials, Psychophysiology, 37, S76
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theta lingua franca: A common mid‐frontal substrate for action monitoring processes
Cavanagh, J. F., Zambrano‐Vazquez, L., & Allen, J. J. B. (2012) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01293.x · Cited by 651
Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior
Ullsperger, M., Danielmeier, C., & Jocham, G. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2012 · Cited by 634
On the ERN and the significance of errors
Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., Yeung, N., & Simons, R. F. (2005) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00270.x · Cited by 608
Overbeek, T. J. M., Nieuwenhuis, S., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005) · Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.319 · Cited by 600
Hajcak, G., McDonald, N., & Simons, R. F. (2003) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00107 · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Vidal, F., Burle, B., Bonnet, M., Grapperon, J., & Hasbroucq, T.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Vidal, F
- Venue
- Biological Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-282
- ISSN
- 0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162919425
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL AMU (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- error-related negativity, CORRECT trial, error detection, choice reaction time, event-related potentials, reaction time
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
