Cited by 161Fluid Dynamics and Heat TransferFluid Dynamics and MixingParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows

Bubble coalescence in turbulent flows: A mechanistic model for turbulence-induced coalescence applied to microgravity bubbly pipe flow

Kamp, A.M, Chesters, A.K, Colin, C, Fabre, J·2001·International Journal of Multiphase Flow

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0301-9322(01)00010-6

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kamp et al. [284] assumed that if a bubble with diameter di coalesces with another bubble of diameter dj, the new formed bubble will have diameter (d_i^3 + d_j^3)^1/3.

    “They assumed that if a bubble with diameter di coalesces with another bubble of diameter dj the new formed bubble will have a diameter ( d 3 i + d 3 j ) 1/3 .”
  • Kamp et al. [284] assume a large collision Reynolds number but a small Weber number, implying that the radius of the resulting film is much smaller than the radii of the bubbles.

    “assuming a large collision Reynolds number but a small Weber number. This implies that the radius of the resulting film is much smaller than the radii of the bubbles.”
  • Kamp et al. [284] disregard work done against viscous dissipation or body forces during collision and assume the system to be isothermal.

    “Besides, they disregard the work done against viscous dissipation or body forces during the collision and assume the system to be isothermal.”
  • Kamp et al. [284] postulated that coalescence occurs if the time required for film drainage from onset of flattening to film rupture is greater than the interval between onset of film formation and the moment when bubbles begin to rebound.

    “Kamp et al. [284] postulated that coalescence occurs if the time required for the film drainage from the onset of flattening to film rupture is greater than the interval between the onset of film formation and the moment when bubbles begin to rebound.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamp, A. M., Chesters, A. K., Colin, C., & Fabre, J.
Affiliations
Institut de Mécanique des Fluides de Toulouse (FR)
Corresponding author
Colin, C
Venue
International Journal of Multiphase Flow
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-08
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
1363-1396
ISSN
0301-9322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079434854
Cited by
161
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Multiphase Flow (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Keywords
bubble coalescence, turbulent flow, bubble size distribution, collision frequency, bubble interaction, microgravity, gas-liquid two-phase flow, parabolic flight experiments, void fraction, integral length scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review