CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7,359Species Distribution and Climate ChangeEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 294 of the 294 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology

Guisan, Antoine, Zimmermann, Niklaus E.·2000·Ecological Modelling
DOI 10.1016/s0304-3800(00)00354-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3800(00)00354-9

Cites

294 of 294 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–294 of 294

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Agee, 1989, A geographic analysis of historical grizzly bear sightings in the North Cascades, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 55, 1637
  2. Bagby, J.E., Brian, I., 1992. Urbanization and its impact on white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) habitat: a GIS/remote sensing approach. In: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Eds.), Proceedings of GIS/LIS '92, Maryland, Bethesda, pp. 85–95.
  3. Chang, K.-T., Yeo, J.J., Verbyla, D.L., Li, Z., 1992. Interfacing GIS with wildlife habitat analysis: a case study of Sitka black-tailed deer in southeast Alaska. In: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Eds.), Proceedings of GIS/LIS '92, Maryland, Bethesda, pp. 96–104.
  4. Ellenberg, 1953, Physiologisches und ökologisches Verhalten derselben Pflanzenarten, Ber. Dtsch. bot. Ges., 65, 351
  5. Fischer, 1990, Simulating the distribution of plant communities in an alpine landscape, Coenoses, 5, 37
  6. Fischer, 1994, Simulation of the spatial distribution of plant communities based on maps of site factors: investigated in the MaB test site Davos. Veröff. Geobot. Inst. Eidgenöss. Tech. Hochsch, Stift. Rübel Zür., 122, 1
  7. Fitzgerald, R.W., Lees, B.G., 1992. The application of neural networks to the floristic classification of remote sensing and GIS data in complex terrain. In: American Society of Photogrametry and Remote Sensing (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVII Congress ASPRS, Bethesda, MD, pp. 570–573.
  8. Foody, 1992, On the compensation for chance agreement in image classification accuracy assessment, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 58, 1459
  9. Franklin, 1991, Vegetation mapping and change detection using SPOT MLA and Landsat imagery in Kluane National Park, Can. J. Remote Sens., 17, 2
  10. Gillison, 1985, The use of gradient directed transects or gradsects in natural resource surveys, J. Environ. Manage., 20, 103
  11. Goedickemeier, 1997, Sampling for vegetation survey: some properties of a GIS-based stratification compared to other statistical sampling methods, Coenoses, 12, 43
  12. Guisan, A., 1997. Distributions de taxons végétaux dans un environnement alpin: application de modélisations statistiques dans un système d'information géographique. PhD Dissertation No 2892, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
  13. Hengeveld, 1987, Scales of variation: their distinction and ecological importance, Ann. Zool. Fenn., 24, 195
  14. Hepner, 1990, Artificial neural network classification using a minimal training set – comparison to conventional supervised classification, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sen., 56, 469
  15. Hodgson, 1988, Monitoring wood stork foraging habitat using remote sensing and Geographic Information Systems, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sen., 54, 1601
  16. Levins, R., 1977. The search for the macroscopic in ecosystems. In: Innes G.S. (Ed.), New Directions in the Analysis of Ecological Systems II, Simulation Council, La Jolla, pp. 213–222.
  17. Levins, 1966, The strategy of model building in population ecology, Am. Sci., 54, 421
  18. Ma, 1995, Tau coefficients for accuracy assessment of classification of remote sensing data, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 61, 435
  19. Mead, R.A., Cockerham, L.S., Robinson, C.M., 1988. Mapping goffer tortoise habitat on the Ocala National Forest using a GIS. In: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Eds.), Proceedings of the GIS/LIS'88, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 395–400.
  20. Schuster, A., 1994. Regional distribution of breeding birds elaborated by a geographic information system – Possibilities and limitations. In: Hagemeijer, E.J.M., Vertrael, T.J. (Eds.), Bird Numbers 1992 – Distribution, monitoring and ecological aspects, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg/Heerlen and SOVON, Beek-Ubbergen, pp. 493–501.
  21. Scott, J.M., Heglund, P.J., Samson, F. Haufler, J., Morrison, M., Raphael, M., Wall, B. (in press). Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale. Island Press, Covelo, California
  22. Scepan, J., Davis, F., Blum, L.L., 1987. A Geographical Information System for managing Californian condor habitat. In: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Eds.), Proceedings of GIS/LIS'87, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 476–486.
  23. Stoms, D.M., Davis, F.W., Cogan, C.B., Painho, M.O., Duncan, B.W., Scepan, J., 1990. Sensitivity of habitat models to uncertainties in GIS data: a Californian condor case study. In: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Eds.), Proceedings of GIS/LIS'90, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 69–78.
  24. Twery, 1991, Scientific exploration with an intelligent GIS: predicting species composition from topography, AI Applications, 5, 45
  25. Walter, 1953, Das Gesetz der relativen Standortskonstanz: Das Wesen der Pflanzengesellschaften, Ber. Dtsch. bot. Ges., 66, 228
  26. Woodward, 1992, A review of the effects of climate on vegetation: ranges, competition, and composition, 105
  27. Zimmermann, N.E., 1996. Ein klimasensitives, räumliches Vegetationsmodell für die alpine Stufe der Schweiz. PhD Dissertation, University of Bern, Switzerland.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7,359

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Guisan, A., & Zimmermann, N. E.
Affiliations
  • info fauna (CH)
  • Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Guisan, Antoine
  • Zimmermann, Niklaus E.
ORCID
Venue
Ecological Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-12
Volume
135
Issue
2-3
Pages
147-186
ISSN
0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0304-3800(00)00354-9
OpenAlex
W2120160157
Cited by
7,359
References
294
Citations by year
2026: 224 · 2025: 315 · 2024: 303 · 2023: 274 · 2022: 359 · 2021: 386 · 2020: 389 · 2019: 317 · 2018: 336 · 2017: 363 · 2016: 358 · 2015: 340 · 2014: 347 · 2013: 386 · 2012: 380
FWCI
61.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Ecological Modelling (publishedVersion)
  • DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
species distribution modeling, generalized linear models, artificial neural networks, generalized additive models, Bayesian model, receiver operating characteristic, model evaluation, model selection, predictor selection, realized niche, conservation biology, climate change, biogeography, model generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review