The DOI matches its Crossref record; 294 of the 294 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A GAM enables fitting non-linear models for a wide family of statistical distributions, and thus is preferred to some other habitat modelling approaches (Guisan and Zimmermann, 2000).”
From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Guisan and Zimmermann, 2000
In the citing paper
“Spatially explicit linear regression models have been conventionally used to predict species and community distribution based on explanatory variables such as climate and topography124,125.”
From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [124]
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · Cited by 46,960
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,867
Classification and Regression Trees.
Ryzin, J. V., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288003 · Cited by 21,030
(2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-27255-0_9 · Cited by 20,333
Hapeman, D. E., & Agresti, A. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484817 · Cited by 9,407
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit
Cohen, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026256 · Cited by 8,736
A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models
FIELDING, A. H., & BELL, J. F. (1997) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892997000088 · Cited by 6,956
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Agee, 1989, A geographic analysis of historical grizzly bear sightings in the North Cascades, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 55, 1637
- Bagby, J.E., Brian, I., 1992. Urbanization and its impact on white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) habitat: a GIS/remote sensing approach. In: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Eds.), Proceedings of GIS/LIS '92, Maryland, Bethesda, pp. 85–95.
- Chang, K.-T., Yeo, J.J., Verbyla, D.L., Li, Z., 1992. Interfacing GIS with wildlife habitat analysis: a case study of Sitka black-tailed deer in southeast Alaska. In: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Eds.), Proceedings of GIS/LIS '92, Maryland, Bethesda, pp. 96–104.
- Ellenberg, 1953, Physiologisches und ökologisches Verhalten derselben Pflanzenarten, Ber. Dtsch. bot. Ges., 65, 351
- Fischer, 1990, Simulating the distribution of plant communities in an alpine landscape, Coenoses, 5, 37
- Fischer, 1994, Simulation of the spatial distribution of plant communities based on maps of site factors: investigated in the MaB test site Davos. Veröff. Geobot. Inst. Eidgenöss. Tech. Hochsch, Stift. Rübel Zür., 122, 1
- Fitzgerald, R.W., Lees, B.G., 1992. The application of neural networks to the floristic classification of remote sensing and GIS data in complex terrain. In: American Society of Photogrametry and Remote Sensing (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVII Congress ASPRS, Bethesda, MD, pp. 570–573.
- Foody, 1992, On the compensation for chance agreement in image classification accuracy assessment, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 58, 1459
- Franklin, 1991, Vegetation mapping and change detection using SPOT MLA and Landsat imagery in Kluane National Park, Can. J. Remote Sens., 17, 2
- Gillison, 1985, The use of gradient directed transects or gradsects in natural resource surveys, J. Environ. Manage., 20, 103
- Goedickemeier, 1997, Sampling for vegetation survey: some properties of a GIS-based stratification compared to other statistical sampling methods, Coenoses, 12, 43
- Guisan, A., 1997. Distributions de taxons végétaux dans un environnement alpin: application de modélisations statistiques dans un système d'information géographique. PhD Dissertation No 2892, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
- Hengeveld, 1987, Scales of variation: their distinction and ecological importance, Ann. Zool. Fenn., 24, 195
- Hepner, 1990, Artificial neural network classification using a minimal training set – comparison to conventional supervised classification, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sen., 56, 469
- Hodgson, 1988, Monitoring wood stork foraging habitat using remote sensing and Geographic Information Systems, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sen., 54, 1601
- Levins, R., 1977. The search for the macroscopic in ecosystems. In: Innes G.S. (Ed.), New Directions in the Analysis of Ecological Systems II, Simulation Council, La Jolla, pp. 213–222.
- Levins, 1966, The strategy of model building in population ecology, Am. Sci., 54, 421
- Ma, 1995, Tau coefficients for accuracy assessment of classification of remote sensing data, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 61, 435
- Mead, R.A., Cockerham, L.S., Robinson, C.M., 1988. Mapping goffer tortoise habitat on the Ocala National Forest using a GIS. In: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Eds.), Proceedings of the GIS/LIS'88, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 395–400.
- Schuster, A., 1994. Regional distribution of breeding birds elaborated by a geographic information system – Possibilities and limitations. In: Hagemeijer, E.J.M., Vertrael, T.J. (Eds.), Bird Numbers 1992 – Distribution, monitoring and ecological aspects, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg/Heerlen and SOVON, Beek-Ubbergen, pp. 493–501.
- Scott, J.M., Heglund, P.J., Samson, F. Haufler, J., Morrison, M., Raphael, M., Wall, B. (in press). Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale. Island Press, Covelo, California
- Scepan, J., Davis, F., Blum, L.L., 1987. A Geographical Information System for managing Californian condor habitat. In: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Eds.), Proceedings of GIS/LIS'87, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 476–486.
- Stoms, D.M., Davis, F.W., Cogan, C.B., Painho, M.O., Duncan, B.W., Scepan, J., 1990. Sensitivity of habitat models to uncertainties in GIS data: a Californian condor case study. In: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Eds.), Proceedings of GIS/LIS'90, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 69–78.
- Twery, 1991, Scientific exploration with an intelligent GIS: predicting species composition from topography, AI Applications, 5, 45
- Walter, 1953, Das Gesetz der relativen Standortskonstanz: Das Wesen der Pflanzengesellschaften, Ber. Dtsch. bot. Ges., 66, 228
- Woodward, 1992, A review of the effects of climate on vegetation: ranges, competition, and composition, 105
- Zimmermann, N.E., 1996. Ein klimasensitives, räumliches Vegetationsmodell für die alpine Stufe der Schweiz. PhD Dissertation, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data
Elith*, J., H. Graham*, C., P. Anderson, R., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., J. Hijmans, R., Huettmann, F., R. Leathwick, J., Lehmann, A., et al. (2006) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x · Cited by 9,088
Self-citationF. Dormann, C., M. McPherson, J., B. Araújo, M., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., G. Davies, R., Hirzel, A., Jetz, W., Daniel Kissling, W., et al. (2007) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x · Cited by 3,433
Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions
Liu, C., Berry, P. M., Dawson, T. P., & Pearson, R. G. (2005) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03957.x · Cited by 2,701
Guisan, A., Edwards, T. C., & Hastie, T. (2002) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00204-1 · Cited by 2,356
Self-citationPerspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation
Tuia, D., Kellenberger, B., Beery, S., Costelloe, B. R., Zuffi, S., Risse, B., Mathis, A., Mathis, M. W., van Langevelde, F., Burghardt, T., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-27980-y · Cited by 740
A checklist for maximizing reproducibility of ecological niche models
Feng, X., Park, D. S., Walker, C., Peterson, A. T., Merow, C., & Papeş, M. (2019) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-019-0972-5 · Cited by 323
Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna
Arrizabalaga, H., Dufour, F., Kell, L., Merino, G., Ibaibarriaga, L., Chust, G., Irigoien, X., Santiago, J., Murua, H., Fraile, I., et al. (2015) · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.07.001 · Cited by 194
A century of fish biomass decline in the ocean
Christensen, V, Coll, M., Piroddi, C., Steenbeek, J., Buszowski, J., & Pauly, D. (2014) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps10946 · Cited by 184
Regression models for spatial prediction: their role for biodiversity and conservation
Lehmann, A., Overton, J. M., & Austin, M. P. (2002) · Biodiversity & Conservation · doi:10.1023/a:1021354914494 · Cited by 111
Bernal, M., Stratoudakis, Y., Coombs, S., Angelico, M. M., de Lanzós, A. L., Porteiro, C., Sagarminaga, Y., Santos, M., Uriarte, A., Cunha, E., et al. (2007) · Progress in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2007.04.018 · Cited by 104
Species Distribution Modeling for Machine Learning Practitioners: A Review
Beery, S., Cole, E., Parker, J., Perona, P., & Winner, K. (2021) · ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies · doi:10.1145/3460112.3471966 · Cited by 100
Substantial declines in urban tree habitat predicted under climate change
Burley, H., Beaumont, L. J., Ossola, A., Baumgartner, J. B., Gallagher, R., Laffan, S., Esperon-Rodriguez, M., Manea, A., & Leishman, M. R. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.287 · Cited by 90
Effects of drought on contrasting insect and plant species in the UK in the mid-1990s
Morecroft, M. D., Bealey, C. E., Howells, O., Rennie, S., & Woiwod, I. P. (2002) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2002.00174.x · Cited by 86
McCLANAHAN, T. R., MAINA, J. M., & MUTHIGA, N. A. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02395.x · Cited by 82
Smoliński, S., & Radtke, K. (2017) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsw136 · Cited by 69
Impact of Temperature Change on the Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda under Global Climate Change
Yan, X.-R., Wang, Z.-Y., Feng, S.-Q., Zhao, Z.-H., & Li, Z.-H. (2022) · Insects · doi:10.3390/insects13110981 · Cited by 71
Ingredients for addressing the challenges of fisheries bycatch
Lewison, R., Soykan, C., Cox, T., Peckham, H., Pilcher, N., LeBoeuf, N., McDonald, S., Moore, J., Safina, C., & Crowder, L. (2011) · Bulletin of Marine Science · doi:10.5343/bms.2010.1062 · Cited by 51
Sartorello, Y., Pastorino, A., Bogliani, G., Ghidotti, S., Viterbi, R., & Cerrato, C. (2020) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125863 · Cited by 46
Muhling, B. A., Brill, R., Lamkin, J. T., Roffer, M. A., Lee, S.-K., Liu, Y., & Muller-Karger, F. (2017) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsw215 · Cited by 36
Capinha, C., Gomes, E., Reis, E., Rocha, J., Sousa, C. A., Do Rosário, V. E., & Almeida, A. P. (2009) · Geospatial health · doi:10.4081/gh.2009.219 · Cited by 28
Do projections from bioclimatic envelope models and climate change metrics match
Garcia, R. A., Cabeza, M., Altwegg, R., & Araújo, M. B. (2016) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.12386 · Cited by 23
Aximoff, I., Carvalho, W. D., Romero, D., Esbérard, C. E. L., Guerrero, J. C., & Rosalino, L. M. (2020) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-020-00017-x · Cited by 16
Cartogramming uncertainty in species distribution models: A Bayesian approach
Rocchini, D., Marcantonio, M., Arhonditsis, G., Cacciato, A. L., Hauffe, H. C., & He, K. S. (2019) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2019.04.002 · Cited by 16
Evaluation of Deep Species Distribution Models Using Environment and Co-occurrences
Deneu, B., Servajean, M., Botella, C., & Joly, A. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28577-7_18 · Cited by 8
Abedin, I., Putra, A., Kang, H.-E., Singh, A., Singh, S., Jung, W.-K., Kim, H.-W., & Kundu, S. (2025) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7140563/v1 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Guisan, A., & Zimmermann, N. E.
- Affiliations
- info fauna (CH)
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Guisan, Antoine
- Zimmermann, Niklaus E.
- Venue
- Ecological Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 147-186
- ISSN
- 0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120160157
- Cited by
- 7,359
- References
- 294
- Citations by year
- 2026: 224 · 2025: 315 · 2024: 303 · 2023: 274 · 2022: 359 · 2021: 386 · 2020: 389 · 2019: 317 · 2018: 336 · 2017: 363 · 2016: 358 · 2015: 340 · 2014: 347 · 2013: 386 · 2012: 380
- FWCI
- 61.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Modelling (publishedVersion)
- DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- species distribution modeling, generalized linear models, artificial neural networks, generalized additive models, Bayesian model, receiver operating characteristic, model evaluation, model selection, predictor selection, realized niche, conservation biology, climate change, biogeography, model generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
