Cited by 120Groundwater flow and contamination studiesEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants

Performance of air sparging systems: A review of case studies

Bass, David H, Hastings, Nicholas A, Brown, Richard A·2000·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

Fluor Daniel GTI (now IT Corporation) has compiled a database of 49 completed in-situ air sparging case studies. Air sparging is a commonly used remediation technology which volatilizes and enhances aerobic biodegradation of contamination in groundwater and saturated zone soil. The air sparging database was compiled to address questions regarding the effectiveness and permanence of air sparging, and to provide predictive indicators of air sparging success to aid in optimization of existing and future air sparging systems. In each case study, groundwater concentrations were compared before sparging was initiated, just before sparging was terminated, and in the months following shutdown of the sparging system. The case studies included both chlorinated solvents and petroleum hydrocarbon contamination, and covered a wide range of soil conditions and sparge system parameters. In many cases, air sparging achieved a substantial and permanent decrease in groundwater concentrations. Successful systems were achieved with both chlorinated and petroleum contamination, both sandy and silty soils, and both continuous and pulsed flow sparging. In other cases, however, a significant rebound of groundwater concentrations was observed after sparging was terminated. Rebound sometimes required 6 to 12 months to develop fully. Rebound was more frequently observed at sites contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons than with chlorinated solvents. Petroleum-contaminated sites were more likely to rebound when initial groundwater contamination levels were high enough to suggest the presence of LNAPL or a smear zone of residual LNAPL. Rebound at petroleum sites appeared to be minimized by a high density of sparge wells addressing the entire source area and a high sparge air injection rate. In some cases, rebound appeared to be related to a rising water table.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00136-3

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In situ aeration (air sparging) is an established method for bioremediation of contaminated groundwater where increased O2 concentrations stimulate growth of aerobic heterotrophs.

    “This is similar to existing technologies for in situ aeration (i.e., air sparging), an established method for bioremediation of contaminated groundwater where increased O 2 concentrations stimulate growth of aerobic heterotrophs (e.g., [78,79]).”

    From Strategizing carbon-neutral mines: A case for pilot projects (2014) · cites this paper as [78]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bass, D. H., Hastings, N. A., & Brown, R. A.
Corresponding author
Hastings, Nicholas A
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-02
Volume
72
Issue
2-3
Pages
101-119
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984669194
Cited by
120
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Keywords
air sparging, groundwater remediation, chlorinated solvents, petroleum contamination, light non-aqueous phase liquids, smear zone, aerobic biodegradation, in situ remediation, performance indicators
MeSH terms
Aerobiosis, Air, Biodegradation, Environmental, Environmental Pollution, Forecasting, Humans, Hydrocarbons, Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated, Petroleum, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Solvents, Time Factors, Volatilization, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Pollution, Chemical, Hazardous Substances, Databases as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review