Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A rat model of bone cancer pain

Medhurst, S. J., Walker, K., Bowes, M., Kidd, B. L., Glatt, M., Muller, M., Hattenberger, M., Vaxelaire, J., O'Reilly, T., Wotherspoon, G., Winter, J., Green, J., Urban, L.·2002·Pain

Abstract

This study describes the first known model of bone cancer pain in the rat. Sprague-Dawley rats receiving intra-tibial injections of syngeneic MRMT-1 rat mammary gland carcinoma cells developed behavioural signs indicative of pain, including: mechanical allodynia, difference of weight bearing between hind paws and mechanical hyperalgesia. The development of the bone tumour and structural damage to the bone was monitored by radiological analysis, quantitative measurement of mineral content and histology. Intra-tibial injections of 3 x 10(3) or 3 x 10(4) syngeneic MRMT-1 cells produced a rapidly expanding tumour within the boundaries of the tibia, causing severe remodelling of the bone. Radiographs showed extensive damage to the cortical bone and the trabeculae by day 10-14 after inoculation of 3 x 10(3) MRMT-1 cells, and by day 20, the damage was threatening the integrity of the tibial bone. While both mineral content and mineral density decreased significantly in the cancerous bone, osteoclast numbers in the peritumoural compact bone remained unchanged. However, tartarate-resistant acid phosphatase staining revealed a large number of polykariotic cells, resembling those of osteoclasts within the tumour. No tumour growth was observed after the injection of heat-killed MRMT-1 cells. Intra-tibial injections of 3 x 10(3) or 3 x 10(4) MRMT-1 cells, heat-killed cells or vehicle did not show changes in body weight and core temperature over 19-20 days. The general activity of animals after injection with live or heat-killed MRMT-1 cells was higher than that of the control group, however, the activity of the MRMT-1 treated group declined during the progress of the disease. Rats receiving intra-tibial injections of MRMT-1 cells displayed the gradual development of mechanical allodynia and mechanical hyperalgesia/reduced weight bearing on the affected limb, beginning on day 12-14 or 10-12 following injection of 3 x 10(3) or 3 x 10(4) cells, respectively. These symptoms were not observed in rats receiving heat-killed cells or vehicle. Behavioural data suggest a reasonable time window for evaluation of anti-nociceptive agents between day 14 and 20 after cancer cell inoculation in this model. Acute treatment with morphine (1-3mg/kg, subcutanously (s.c.)) produced a dose-dependent reduction in the response frequency of hind paw withdrawal to von Frey filament stimulation 17 or 19 days following intra-tibial injections of 3 x 10(3) MRMT-1 cells. A significant reduction in the difference in hind limb weight bearing was also observed. Acute treatment with celebrex (10-30 mg/kg, s.c.) did not affect mechanical allodynia or difference in weight bearing in rats 20 days following treatment with 3 x 10(3) MRMT-1 cells. Although the pathophysiology of cancer pain is largely unknown, significant enhancement of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) staining in the corresponding segments of the ipsilateral spinal cord highlights the possible involvement of astrocytes. In summary, the induction of bone cancer in the rat by the syngeneic MRMT-1 mammary tumour cell line provides a valid pre-clinical model for pain associated with bone metastases. Significant mechanical hyperalgesia and allodynia develops in association with the progression of the tumour in the bone marrow cavity, while the general condition of the animal remains satisfactory. While acute treatment with morphine has some analgesic effect on hind limb sparing the selective COX-2 inhibitor, celebrex, has no influence on the pain-related behavioural changes in this model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00437-7

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Medhurst, S. J., Walker, K., Bowes, M., Kidd, B. L., Glatt, M., Muller, M., Hattenberger, M., Vaxelaire, J., O'Reilly, T., Wotherspoon, G., Winter, J., Green, J., & Urban, L.
Venue
Pain
Published
2002-03
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
129-140
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039286479
Cited by
311
References
18
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A rat model of bone cancer pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00437-7
The paper
Medhurst, S. J., Walker, K., Bowes, M., Kidd, B. L., Glatt, M., Muller, M., Hattenberger, M., Vaxelaire, J., O'Reilly, T., Wotherspoon, G., Winter, J., Green, J., & Urban, L. (2002). A rat model of bone cancer pain. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00437-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.