Cited by 301Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Tailored cognitive-behavioral therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis for patients at risk: a randomized controlled trial

Evers, Andrea W.M, Kraaimaat, Floris W, van Riel, Piet L.C.M, de Jong, Alphons J.L·2002·Pain

Abstract

Recent developments in chronic pain research suggest that effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) may be optimized when applying early, customized treatments to patients at risk. For this purpose, a randomized, controlled trial with tailor-made treatment modules was conducted among patients with relatively early rheumatoid arthritis (RA disease duration of <8 years), who had been screened for psychosocial risk profiles. All participants received standard medical care from a rheumatologist and rheumatology nurse consultant. Patients in the CBT condition additionally received an individual CBT treatment with two out of four possible treatment modules. Choice of treatment modules was determined on the basis of patient priorities, which resulted in most frequent application of the fatigue module, followed by the negative mood, social relationships and pain and functional disability modules. Analyses of completers and of intention-to-treat revealed beneficial effects of CBT on physical, psychological and social functioning. Specifically, fatigue and depression were significantly reduced at post-treatment and at the 6-month follow-up in the CBT condition in comparison to the control condition, while perceived support increased at follow-up assessment. In addition, helplessness decreased at post-treatment and follow-up assessment, active coping with stress increased at post-treatment, and compliance with medication increased at follow-up assessment in the CBT condition i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00274-9

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evers, A. W. M., Kraaimaat, F. W., van Riel, P. L. C. M., & de Jong, A. J. L.
Affiliations
Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Evers, Andrea W.M
Venue
Pain
Published
2002-11
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
141-153
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022537466
Cited by
301
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, early rheumatoid arthritis, tailored treatment, psychosocial risks, fatigue, depression, helplessness, stress coping, medication adherence, social functioning, patient priorities, treatment modules
MeSH terms
Adult, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Patient Dropouts, Psychology, Risk Factors, Social Behavior, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review