Cited by 158Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

The relationship of arthritis self-efficacy to daily pain, daily mood, and daily pain coping in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Lefebvre, John C, Keefe, Francis J, Affleck, Glenn, Raezer, Lauren B, Starr, Kathleen, Caldwell, David S, Tennen, Howard·1999·Pain

Abstract

There is an increasing awareness in the medical community that psychosocial variables such as beliefs in self-efficacy are important determinants of treatment outcome. However, before measures of self-efficacy are widely incorporated into clinical practice, there needs to be a better understanding of how they relate to daily pain, mood and coping. In the present study 128 rheumatoid arthritis patients completed diaries for 30 days in which they provided daily ratings of joint pain, negative and positive mood, the use of pain coping strategies, and coping efficacy. The patients then participated in an evaluation session during which measures of self-efficacy (the Arthritis Self Efficacy Scale (ASES)), demographic variables, and medical status were collected. A series of hierarchical regression analyses was conducted to determine the degree to which self-efficacy measures collected at the time of the evaluation session were related to daily diary measures collected during the 30 preceding days. The results revealed that self-efficacy was significantly related to daily ratings of pain, mood, coping and coping efficacy. Interestingly, the findings regarding self-efficacy were obtained even after taking into account the effects of important demographic and medical status variables. Taken together, these results suggest that self-efficacy ratings collected from arthritis patients at the time of an evaluation session may well be related to recent experiences of daily pain and mood,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00242-5

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-efficacy ratings collected from patients with arthritis at the time of an evaluation session are meaningfully related to recent experiences of daily pain and mood, as well as to the daily use and perceived effectiveness of pain coping strategies.

    “These results suggest that self-efficacy ratings collected from patients with arthritis at the time of an evaluation session are meaningfully related to recent experiences of daily pain and mood, as well as to the daily use and perceived effectiveness of pain coping strategies.”
  • In a study of 128 patients with persistent pain caused by rheumatoid arthritis, self-efficacy measured in a clinical evaluation session was significantly related to daily ratings of pain, mood, coping, and coping efficacy, even after taking into account demographic and medical status variables.

    “Regression analyses revealed that self-efficacy, as measured in the clinical evaluation session, was significantly related to daily ratings of pain, mood, coping, and coping efficacy, even after taking into account the effects of important demographic and medical status variables.”
  • Questionnaire measures of self-efficacy are valid and support their use as an efficient method of gathering data in clinical settings.

    “Taken together, they support the validity of questionnaire measures of self-efficacy and support their use as an efficient method of gathering data in clinical settings.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lefebvre, J. C., Keefe, F. J., Affleck, G., Raezer, L. B., Starr, K., Caldwell, D. S., & Tennen, H.
Affiliations
  • Ohio University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Keefe, Francis J
Venue
Pain
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
425-435
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989379418
Cited by
158
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Arthritis Foundation
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-42261, R01AR042261)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
arthritis self-efficacy, rheumatoid arthritis, joint pain, mood, pain coping, coping self-efficacy, Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Multivariate Analysis, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review