Cited by 93Taxation and Compliance StudiesCorruption and Economic DevelopmentCrime, Illicit Activities, and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fiscal Corruption: A Vice or a Virtue?

Open access
Fjeldstad, Odd-Helge, Tungodden, Bertil·2003·World Development

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0305-750x(03)00089-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weak and often corrupt revenue administration remains a fundamental barrier to effective and fair taxation and to building wider trust between government and citizens in many countries.

    “But there is no doubt that weak and often corrupt revenue administration remains a fundamental barrier to effective and fair taxation and to building wider trust between government and citizens in many countries (Fjeldstad and Tungodden 2003; Fjeldstad 2009).”

    From Tax And Development: Donor Support To Strengthen Tax Systems In Developing Countries (2014) · cites this paper as Fjeldstad and Tungodden 2003

    The Introduction links corruption in tax collection to lost revenue, and Sections 3 and 4 describe how corrupt or unfair treatment can undermine compliance and government trustworthiness. The claim is broader and more certain than the paper: it calls weak revenue administration a fundamental barrier to fair taxation and wider trust, whereas the paper focuses on fiscal corruption and generally describes its longer-term effects as possible or likely. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Alm, 1991, Tax base erosion in developing countries, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 39, 849, 10.1086/451912 · DOI
  2. Andvig, 1990, How corruption may corrupt, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 3, 63, 10.1016/0167-2681(90)90053-G · DOI
  3. Banerjee, 1992, A simple model of herd behaviour, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 797, 10.2307/2118364 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bardhan, P. (1995). Research on poverty and development––twenty years after redistribution with growth. Paper prepared for the Annual conference on development economics, May 1–2. The World Bank, Washington, DC
  5. Besley, 1993, Taxes and bribery: the role of wage incentives, Economic Journal, 103, 119, 10.2307/2234340 · DOI
  6. Bird, 1990, Expenditures, administration and tax reform in developing countries, International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation: Bulletin, 263
  7. Brehm, 1997, Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital, American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999, 10.2307/2111684 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Chand, 1999, Controlling fiscal corruption, World Development, 27, 1129, 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00050-9 · DOI
  9. Devas, 2001, Revenue authorities: are they the right vehicle for improved tax administration?, Public Administration and Development, 21, 211, 10.1002/pad.174 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Fauvelle-Aymar, 1999, The political and tax capacity of government in developing countries, Kyklos, 52, 391, 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1999.tb00224.x · DOI
  11. Fehr, 2000, Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 159, 10.1257/jep.14.3.159 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Fjeldstad, 2001, Why people pay taxes: The case of the development levy in Tanzania, World Development, 29, 2059, 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00081-X · DOI · Paper page
  13. Flatters, 1995, Administrative corruption and taxation, International Tax and Public Finance, 2, 397, 10.1007/BF00872774 · DOI
  14. Graetz, 1986, The tax compliance game: towards an interactive theory of law enforcement, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 38, 1
  15. Hardin, 1996, Trustworthiness, Ethics, 26, 10.1086/233695 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hindriks, 1999, Corruption, extortion and evasion, Journal of Public Economics, 74, 395, 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00030-4 · DOI
  17. Laffont, 1991, The politics of government decision-making: a theory of regulatory capture, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1089, 10.2307/2937958 · DOI
  18. Lipset, 1959, Some social requisites of democracy, economic development and political legitimacy, American Political Science Review, 53, 69, 10.2307/1951731 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Miller, W., Grødeland, Å., & Koshechkina, T. (1998). What is to be done about corrupt officials? Public opinion in Ukraine, Bulgaria, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Paper prepared for the Network of Institutes and Schools of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe (NISPAcee) 6th annual conference, Prague, March 18–20
  20. Mookherjee, D. (1997). Incentive reforms in developing country bureaucracies. Lessons from tax administration. Paper prepared for the Annual Bank conference on development economics, Washington, DC: The World Bank
  21. Myrdal, G. (1968). Corruption––Its causes and effects. In G. Myrdal (Ed.), Asian drama: An enquiry into the poverty of nations (Vol. II, pp. 937–951). New York: The Twentieth Century Fund (Re-published in A. Heidenheimer & M. Johnston (Eds.). (2002), Political corruption. Concepts & contexts (3rd. ed., pp. 265–279). New Brunswick/London: Transaction Publishers)
  22. Richupan, S. (1984). Income tax evasion: a review of the measurement of techniques and some estimates for the developing countries. Departmental Memorandum No. DM/84/46. The International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department, Washington, DC
  23. Sah, 1991, Social osmosis and patterns of crime, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 1272, 10.1086/261800 · DOI
  24. Snavely, 1990, Governmental policies to reduce tax evasion: coerced behaviour versus services and values development, Policy Sciences, 23, 57, 10.1007/BF00136992 · DOI
  25. Toye, 1998, Taxation, corruption and reform, The European Journal of Development Research, 10, 60, 10.1080/09578819808426702 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fjeldstad, O.-H., & Tungodden, B.
Affiliations
Chr. Michelsen Institute (NO)
Venue
World Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
1459-1467
ISSN
0305-750X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128942533
Cited by
93
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Development (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Taxation and Compliance Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Keywords
tax administration, tax evasion, tax revenue, democracy, good governance, developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review