Cited by 85African studies and sociopolitical issuesMicrofinance and Financial InclusionUrban and Rural Development Challenges

Livelihood Change in Rural Zimbabwe over 20 Years

Open access
Mushongah, Josphat, Scoones, Ian·2012·Journal of Development Studies

Abstract

This article explores the changing livelihood strategies among a group of rural households in southern Zimbabwe across 20 years. The study uses a combination of a household survey, in-depth biographical interviews and wealth ranking to examine livelihood change. The households studied in 1986–1987 were all traced two decades on, and the pattern of livelihood transitions was analysed. In addition, a set of ‘secondary households’, offshoots of the original ‘primary households’, were also traced, revealing important changes in livelihood opportunity for the next generation. The article reflects on the methodological challenges of exploring longitudinal livelihood change. In conclusion, the key dynamics of livelihood transitions over this period are highlighted, along with the implications these have for rural development and agrarian change.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This paper traces livelihood change among rural households in Mazvihwa, southern Zimbabwe, from 1986–1987 to 2006–2007 using repeat surveys, biographical interviews, and wealth ranking. It finds substantial movement up and down wealth ranks, but the next rural-based generation is generally poorer, with assets, health, education, remittances, and land reform shaping trajectories.

Key findings

  • Among 66 primary households, 40.9% (27) stayed in the same wealth rank, 27.1% (18) declined, and 31.8% (21) improved; nearly 60% changed rank over 20 years.
  • Decline was tied to death and illness: 123 members of the original primary households had died by 2006–2007, and 53% of those deaths were reportedly HIV/AIDS-related, including eight primary household heads. Declining households’ cattle holdings fell from an average of 6.1 to 3.2, and land area from 6.5 ha to 3.1 ha; upwardly mobile households’ cattle rose from 2.7 to 8.1.
  • Secondary households were mostly worse off: of 62 studied in 2006–2007, 34 ranked below their origin primary household and only eight ranked higher; compared with 1986–1987 primary equivalents, 36 ranked lower, 10 higher, and 16 the same, with 72.3% in the lowest two ranks.
  • Wealth perceptions and off-farm work shifted: by 2006–2007 good health, education, remittances, and modern goods mattered more, while cattle and land remained central; gardening rose from fifth to first among off-farm income sources, gold panning and cross-border trading appeared, and agricultural labour hiring fell sharply (weeding from 32% to 4.5%, ploughing from 23% to 0%, harvesting from 23% to 3%).

Methods

  • Longitudinal restudy in Mazvihwa communal area, Zvishavane district, southern Zimbabwe. The 1986–1987 sample had 71 households and 721 individuals, stratified by cattle ownership; the 2006–2007 re-study traced 66 primary households representing 979 individuals, plus 173 secondary households, of which 62 were analysed (57 in Mazvihwa and five in an adjacent fast-track resettlement area).
  • Mixed methods: repeat household survey, in-depth biographical interviews with households that changed rank (21 increases and 18 decreases), and wealth-ranking workshops with men and women (2006–2007: 17 men and 21 women; 1986–1987: 13 men and 10 women), producing four ranks.
  • Analysis compared wealth ranks with survey indicators, off-farm income rankings, labour hiring, and transition tables, using Dorward’s categories of stepping up, stepping out, hanging in, and dropping out.

Limitations

  • The paper states that a household focus can miss intra-household relations and overemphasise male activities, that cluster relations among households can be under-emphasised, and that wealth ranking has been criticised as narrow and potentially subject to group-based exclusions or biases.
  • The authors also note that the sample was small, though intensive contact reduced attrition and tracing problems.
  • Evident from the text: the study is local and not nationally representative, wealth ranks are relative within the community rather than absolute, and some causal attributions—especially HIV/AIDS-related deaths—are based on reported information rather than verified diagnoses.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00220388.2012.671474

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 20 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    There has been a dramatic decline in labour hiring for all agricultural activities overall.

    “As Table 3 shows, there has been a dramatic decline in labour hiring for all agricultural activities overall.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The average age of the household head in the primary households increased from 49.5 years in 1986-1987 to 62.4 years in 2006-2007.

    “The average age of the household head 6 in the 1986-1987 study was 49.5 (range 29-93 years), but by 2006-2007 it was 62.4 (with an even larger range of 18-90 years).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Wealth ranks are closely related to farm asset ownership (livestock, roofing, equipment).

    “Wealth ranks are closely related to farm asset ownership (livestock, roofing, equipment).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In 1986-1987, criteria for wealth included number of cattle owned, crop production, income from remittances, rural non-farm income, type of house, education of children, and groceries.

    “A number of criteria emerged in the 1986-1987 workshops, including: number of cattle owned; crop production; income from remittances; rural non-farm income; type of house; education of children; and groceries (bread, tea, margarine).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Land area did not increase significantly for upwardly mobile households that remained in Mazvihwa.

    “Land area did not increase significantly for those who remained in Mazvihwa”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 49
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The mortality pattern reflects both an ageing population and exposure to HIV infection over the last two decades.

    “This pattern reflects both an ageing population, but also one exposed over the last two decades to HIV infection, even if incidence has been declining in the past decade (Halperin et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Halperin et al., 2011 source

      The “Trends in HIV Prevalence and Incidence and Sexual Behavior in Zimbabwe” section reports substantial HIV prevalence in the 1990s and declining incidence thereafter. The “Synthesis of Data” section also discusses estimated AIDS deaths. Neither section attributes a mortality pattern to population ageing, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In 2006-2007, the main criteria for wealth were number of cattle owned, land size and crop outputs, good health, children's education, off-farm income (including remittances), farm equipment owned, ownership of 'modern gadgets', and hiring of farm labour.

    “In 2006-2007, many of the criteria were the same, but there was a different emphasis.The main criteria were: number of cattle owned; land size and crop outputs; good health; children's education; off-farm income (including remittances); farm equipment owned; ownership of 'modern gadgets'; and hiring of farm labour.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The data show a strong association between wealth rank and survey measures across the range of criteria, with ordering of ranks and survey data averages highly consistent.

    “The data show a strong association between wealth rank and measures across the range of criteria.Ordering of ranks and survey data averages is highly consistent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In terms of field areas and crop production, there is a discontinuity between wealth rank 1 and others in 1986-1987 and between ranks 1 and 2 and others in 2006-2007.

    “In terms of field areas and crop production, there is a discontinuity shown between wealth rank 1 and others in 1986-1987 and between ranks 1 and 2 and others in 2006-2007.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The tracking data showed wide dispersal of next-generation secondary households, including abroad (8.1% South Africa, 1.2% Botswana, 1.7% UK), resettlement (5.2% before 2000, 6.9% after 2000), and other rural-rural migration (7.5%).

    “The tracking data showed the wide dispersal of next-generation secondary households, including abroad in the diaspora, notably in South Africa (8.1%), Botswana (1.2%) and the UK (1.7%).Secondary households also took up resettlement opportunities, both before (5.2%) and after 2000 (6.9%), and some moved to other districts as part of informal rural-rural migrations (7.5%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Of 123 primary household members who died by 2006-2007, 53% reportedly died of HIV/AIDS-related illnesses, including eight primary household heads.

    “Across all individuals identified as members of the primary households in 1986-1987, 123 people had died by 2006-2007, and of these 53 per cent had reportedly died of HIV/AIDS-related illnesses, including eight primary household heads (Mushongah, 2009: 150-151).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mushongah, 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Overall, 36.4% of secondary households established rural homes close to their parents (32.9% with independent fields), and 32.9% established homes in Zimbabwean towns and cities without a rural home base.

    “While overall 36.4 per cent of secondary households established rural homes close to their parents (32.9% with independent fields), a similar number (32.9%) had established homes in Zimbabwean towns and cities, without a rural home base.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A transition to a lower wealth rank involved a death or extended illness of one of the household heads, particularly in five households where the household heads' spouses also fell ill and died.

    “A transition to a lower rank (higher number) involved, for example, a death or extended illness of one of the household heads.This was particularly so in five households where the household heads' spouses also fell ill and subsequently died.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Retrospective biographical interviews accurately capture the timing and causes of livelihood changes over 20 years.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For secondary households, only wealth rank 1 households own significant assets (notably livestock), but this does not translate into crop production.

    “Overall for primary households there is less of a skewed distribution of both production and assets in 2006-2007, although around a lower mean; while for secondary households it is only wealth rank 1 households which own significant assets (notably livestock), although this does not translate into crop production.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Gardening was more associated with poorer groups in 1986-1987, while in 2006-2007 wealth ranks 1 and 2 earned more income from gardening.

    “There have been some switches in focus too, with gardening, for example, being more associated with poorer groups in 1986-1987, while in 2006-2007 it was wealth ranks 1 and 2 who earned more income from gardening.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For primary households, there is less skewed distribution of production and assets in 2006-2007 than in 1986-1987, although around a lower mean.

    “Overall for primary households there is less of a skewed distribution of both production and assets in 2006-2007, although around a lower mean; while for secondary households it is only wealth rank 1 households which own significant assets (notably livestock), although this does not translate into crop production.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Nearly 60% of households changed wealth rank over the 20-year period, representing substantial dynamism in wealth status.

    “Thus in a period of 20 years, nearly 60 per cent of households had changed rank, representing a substantial dynamism in wealth status.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The same wealth ranking methodology in 1986-1987 and 2006-2007 yields comparable wealth ranks over time.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Twenty years ago, income associated with successful crop production (piece work labour and beer brewing) was more important, while in 2006-2007 people focus on off-farm production activities such as poultry rearing and gardening.

    “Twenty years ago, income associated with successful crop production -such as piece work labour and beer brewing -were more important, while today people focus on 'off-farm' production activities such as poultry rearing and gardening, including the cultivation of marijuana.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    By 2006-2007, 78% of original primary households were still resident in Mazvihwa, 4% had moved to frontier districts, 1% to pre-2000 resettlement schemes, and 10% to new resettlement areas.

    “By 2006-2007 most of the original primary households were still resident in Mazviwha (78%), but others had moved to frontier districts as part of informal migration to new rural areas (4%), to pre-2000 resettlement schemes (1%) and to the new resettlement areas as part of land invasions and fast-track land reform (10%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Some new off-farm cash income sources are evident in 2006-2007, including gold panning and cross-border trading, while others have disappeared, such as savings clubs and hunting.

    “Some new income sources are evident in 2006-2007, including gold panning and cross-border trading, while others have disappeared, such as savings clubs (due to a lack of cash) and hunting (due to the resettlement of the former farms).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Perceptions of wealth shifted between 1986-1987 and 2006-2007, with greater emphasis on good health and ownership of material goods, and reduced focus on cash income earning.

    “Over time, then, perceptions of wealth have shifted.By 2006-2007 there was more of an emphasis on good health, as well as ownership of a range of material goods, and a reduced focus on cash income earning because of hyperinflation and economic collapse.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The same wealth ranking methodology in 1986-1987 and 2006-2007 yields comparable wealth ranks over time.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The 62 secondary households sampled in 2006-2007 had an average age of household head of 32.7 years.

    “These 62 secondary households had an average age of household head of 32.7 years (range 21 to 71).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In 2006-2007, 34 secondary households had ranks lower than their origin primary households, while only eight were higher.

    “But this is not the case, as there are 34 such secondary households whose ranks are lower, while only eight are higher than their 'origin' primary households.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The patterns of decline are not universal; some people are doing well, even in difficult circumstances, among both primary and secondary households.

    “But the patterns of decline are not universal.There are some people who are doing well, even in such difficult circumstances, among both primary and secondary households.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Increases in wealth rank were usually associated with accumulation of assets, with cattle being a key indicator.

    “Increases in rank were usually associated with accumulation of assets, again cattle being a key indicator.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Secondary households linked to upwardly mobile primary households were more likely to be non-resident, having moved away from Mazvhiwa and in gainful employment, sometimes abroad.

    “The secondary households linked to this upwardly mobile group of households were more likely to be non-resident, having moved away from Mazvhiwa and in gainful employment, sometimes abroad.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    By 2006-2007, upwardly mobile households had been farming for 20 years; some had returned from work with retrenchment packages, and children had grown up providing remittances and support.

    “By 2006-2007, they had been farming for 20 years; some had returned from periods of work, sometimes with windfall packages from retrenchments, and children had often grown up, providing remittances and other forms of support.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The threshold level of asset ownership linked to wealth is different for different people and interacts with other variables.

    “As the ranking workshop discussions highlighted, the threshold level is different for different people, and interacts with other variables.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among the 11 households that moved out, only one declined in rank, four increased, and all others maintained their earlier rank.

    “Of these households, only one had declined in rank (a household in the frontier areas), while four had increased in rank (two from the 'fast track' resettlements, one from the frontier area and the one household which had been resettled before 2000).All others had maintained their earlier rank.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In the 2000s, cattle populations were again affected by drought (notably 2000-2001 and 2004-2005), and mortalities increased due to tick-borne disease caused by lack of dipping as veterinary facilities declined.

    “In the 2000s, cattle populations were again affected by drought (notably in 2000-20001 and 2004-2005, although more modestly than the dramatic declines of 1991-1992), and mortalities increased due to an increase in tick-borne disease caused by the lack of dipping, as veterinary facilities declined.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Households whose ranks declined had fewer cattle in 2006-2007 (mean 3.2, SD 2.4) than in 1986-1987 (mean 6.1, SD 9.8), and the same pattern applied to goats and donkeys.

    “Those whose ranks declined over this period all had fewer cattle holdings than they did two decades before, declining from an average of 6.1 (SD: 9.8) in 1986-1987 to 3.2 (SD: 2.4) in 2006-2007, and the same pattern applied to goats and donkeys.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the comparison of 2006-2007 secondary households with 1986-1987 primary household equivalents, 36 secondary households were ranked lower, only 10 higher, and 16 the same.

    “36 secondary households of 2006-2007 are ranked lower than their 1986-1987 primary household equivalents, while only 10 households were higher in rank.16 households were categorised in the same rank.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Core assets, notably land and cattle, remained essential and an important hedge against inflation.

    “Yet having core assets, notably land and cattle, remained essential and an important hedge against such rampant inflation, and thus indicators such as a 'good home' persisted.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The same wealth ranking methodology in 1986-1987 and 2006-2007 yields comparable wealth ranks over time.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Such remittances are often invested in farm-based assets, such as cattle and equipment, and these asset investments may help shift a household over a threshold and into an upward trajectory.

    “Such remittances are often invested in farm-based assets, such as cattle and equipment, and these asset investments may help shift a household over a threshold and into an upward trajectory”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A lack of household assets, limited access to off-farm employment, and a decline in cluster-based support from others all contribute to the next generation not prospering.

    “A lack of household assets, limited access to off-farm employment and a decline in cluster-based support from others, all contribute.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    A diversified livelihood strategy is common in Zimbabwe, bridging on- and off-farm income earning, and rural and urban spaces.

    “A diversified livelihood strategy is common in Zimbabwe, bridging on-and off-farm income earning, and rural and urban spaces.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The investment in education following Independence resulted in a highly educated work-force able to seek remittance earning opportunities in the last two decades, particularly abroad.

    “For example, the investment in education following Independence resulted in a highly educated work-force, able to seek remittance earning opportunities in the last two decades, particularly abroad.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Resettlement, formal and informal, has been an important opportunity for some, with new land assets being the basis for increasing wealth.

    “Resettlement -formal and informal -has thus been an important opportunity for some, with the new land assets being the basis for increasing 'wealth'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The demographic cycle makes a big difference to livelihood outcomes.

    “The demographic cycle, as already discussed, makes a big difference.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Others have argued that group-based participatory methods can result in exclusions and biases.

    “Others have argued that group-based participatory methods can result in exclusions and biases (Mosse, 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mosse, 1994 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    'Stepping up' or 'out' may be possible in periods of wider economic prosperity, but may be very difficult when the broader economy is in decline, such as in the 2000s or following structural adjustment in the 1990s.

    “'Stepping up' or 'out' may be possible in periods of wider economic prosperity, but may be very difficult when the broader economy is in decline, such as in the 2000s or following structural adjustment in the 1990s.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 1990s structural adjustment and post-1997 economic implosion caused job losses and loss of external income.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Those 'hanging in' or 'dropping out' include a wider group of 'footloose labour', linked to a 'semi-peasantry' unable to socially reproduce.

    “Those 'hanging in' or 'dropping out', by contrast, include a wider group of 'footloose labour', linked to a 'semi-peasantry' unable to socially reproduce (Cousins et al., 1992;Bernstein, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cousins et al., 1992 source
    • cites Bernstein, 2004 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Having sufficient animals for a draught team (four cattle, or in combination with donkeys) is vital for timely ploughing and planting, which is critical to agricultural success in a dryland area.

    “Having sufficient animals for a draught team (four cattle, or in combination with donkeys) is vital for timely ploughing and planting, which is in turn critical to agricultural success in a dryland area.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The notion of 'wealth' is seen potentially as too narrow, and some have preferred more generic criteria such as 'wellbeing' or 'success'.

    “For example, the notion of 'wealth' is seen potentially as too narrow.Some have preferred to use a more generic criterion, such as 'wellbeing' (Gough and McGregor, 2007) or 'success' (Scoones et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gough and McGregor, 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Scoones et al., 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Temporal patterns are highly significant in livelihood change.

    “Very often temporal patterns are highly significant too.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The ability to withstand shocks and stresses is substantially enhanced through asset accumulation, notably cattle ('stepping up'), and through 'stepping out', particularly remittances across generations.

    “The ability to withstand shocks and stresses is substantially enhanced either through asset accumulation, notably of cattle ('stepping up'), but also by 'stepping out', particularly through the provision of remittances across generations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Sudden events such as a death, retrenchment or drought may have the biggest impact, moving a household from 'stepping up' to 'hanging in' and sometimes 'dropping out'.

    “As emphasised above, the sudden impact of a death, a retrenchment or a drought may have the biggest impact, moving a household from a trajectory of 'stepping up' to a more precarious 'hanging in' strategy, with some ultimately 'dropping out'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    With a few exceptions, the next rural-based generation is slipping deeper into poverty, and the trajectories of positive change observed for primary households that increased rank over 20 years are no longer available for most.

    “With a few exceptions, the next rural-based generation is slipping deeper into poverty, and the trajectories of positive change observed for those primary households which have increased their rank level over 20 years are no longer available for most.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Relationships among households within 'clusters' can also be under-emphasised.

    “Relationships among households within 'clusters' can also be under-emphasised (Drinkwater, 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Drinkwater, 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Increased land area resulted in boosts in farm production and accumulation of assets, a pattern seen more widely in the neighbouring province of Masvingo and elsewhere.

    “This was only a small group in this sample, but it was striking that increased land area resulted in boosts in farm production and accumulation of assets, a pattern seen more widely in the neighbouring province of Masvingo and elsewhere (Moyo et al., 2009;Scoones et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Moyo et al., 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Scoones et al., 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Having plenty of cattle may be significant but becomes less of a wealth generator if there is no labour to herd it.

    “For example, having plenty of cattle may be significant, but becomes less of a wealth generator if there is no labour to herd it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Leaving the rural areas and a reliance on agricultural production may be an important livelihood strategy.

    “Fourth, leaving the rural areas, and a reliance on agricultural production, may be an important livelihood strategy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Wealth ranking methods have been specifically critiqued.

    “Wealth ranking methods have been specifically critiqued (Adams et al., 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Adams et al., 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Accumulation of assets is often reliant on a combination of both 'stepping up' and 'stepping out' livelihood strategies, and dependence on one, whether farming or off-farm employment, is always risky.

    “First, accumulation of assets is often reliant on a combination of both 'stepping up' and 'stepping out' livelihood strategies, and dependence on one, whether farming or off-farm employment, is always risky.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The decline in health and education provision in Zimbabwe over the last decade has been dramatic, with the quality of rural service provision now very poor across the country.

    “The decline in health and education provision in Zimbabwe over the last decade has been dramatic, with the quality of rural service provision now very poor across the country (Nyazema, 2010), 13 suggesting another urgent rural development priority.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nyazema, 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The children in upwardly mobile households benefited from post-Independence education investments and, now in their 20s and 30s, were able to manage economic shocks better than others.

    “These were the children who benefited from post-Independence education investments, and now in their 20s and 30s were able to manage the economic shocks of the period better than others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Using a combination of methods, including individual, household and group based approaches, both qualitative and quantitative, can reveal deeper insights, allowing for triangulation between different sources.

    “However, we argue that using a combination of methods, including individual, household and group based approaches, both qualitative and quantitative, can reveal deeper insights, allowing for triangulation between different sources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A focus on households as a unit potentially ignores many important intra-household relations and sometimes results in emphasising male livelihood activities, to the exclusion of women and young people.

    “For example, a focus on households as a unit potentially ignores many important intra-household relations, and results sometimes in the emphasising of male livelihood activities, to the exclusion of women and young people (Guyer and Peters, 1987;O'Laughlin, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Guyer and Peters, 1987

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites O'Laughlin, 1998 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Livelihood improvements may take many years, with small gains made each year from crop sales or employment savings, and are highly dependent on stability in livelihood opportunity and intrahousehold cooperation.

    “Second, livelihood improvements may take many years, with small gains made each year from crop sales or employment savings, and is highly dependent on stability in livelihood opportunity and intrahousehold cooperation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    New secondary households are more individualised and reliant on their own, often very limited, resources.

    “New secondary households are more individualised and reliant on their own, often very limited, resources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Dorward's categorisation of livelihood transitions is suggestive of broader processes of class formation and agrarian change, with 'stepping up' relating to accumulation from below and formation of petty commodity producers, and 'stepping out' relating to accumulation linked to off-farm activities and a class of 'worker peasants'.

    “Dorward's categorisation of livelihood transitions is suggestive of broader processes of class formation and agrarian change, with 'stepping up', relating to processes of 'accumulation from below' (Neocosmos, 1993), and the formation of a class of petty commodity producers, while 'stepping out' relates to a process of accumulation more firmly linked to off-farm activities, and including a class of”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Neocosmos, 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A combined methods approach, linking survey methods, in-depth biographical interviews and wealth ranking, can be a useful contribution towards such analysis.

    “Thus a combined methods approach, linking survey methods, in-depth biographical interviews and wealth ranking can, we argue, be a useful contribution towards such analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Exactly the same wealth ranking approach was used in the repeat study, including the same workshop facilitators and many of the same informants.

    “Exactly the same approach was used in the repeat study, including involving the same workshop facilitators and many of the same informants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such a structural political economy analysis, linked to detailed livelihood data, can help understand the pattern of livelihood strategies in a broader context of agrarian change.

    “Such a structural political economy analysis, linked to detailed livelihood data, can help us understand the pattern of livelihood strategies in a broader context of agrarian change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Any such analysis must be rooted in detailed understandings of the particular setting in order to comprehend the concrete and broader structural political-economic processes.

    “Any such analysis, as Marx (1973: 101) reminded us, must be rooted in the detailed understandings of the particular setting -the 'rich totality of many determinations' -in order to comprehend 'the concrete' -and broader, structural political-economic processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marx (1973: 101)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

60 of 60
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most insights into rural livelihood change are based on snapshots.

    “Most insights into rural livelihood change are based on snapshots.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Retrospective biographical interviews accurately capture the timing and causes of livelihood changes over 20 years.

    “This qualitative life history interviewing proved enormously valuable for exploring complex causal relationships.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The same wealth ranking methodology in 1986-1987 and 2006-2007 yields comparable wealth ranks over time.

    “The 2006-2007 ranking workshops followed the same methodology as used in 1986-1987 (Scoones, 1995).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 1986-1987 and 2006-2007 wealth rankings are comparable across time and between primary and secondary households for measuring livelihood change.

    “Given the generational shift over the last 20 years, one 'control' for this would be to compare the secondary households today with the primary households from 1986-1987.Table 6 offers this comparison.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 1990s structural adjustment and post-1997 economic implosion caused job losses and loss of external income.

    “This was particularly an issue during the 1990s as structural adjustment hit hard, and people lost jobs, and especially so post-1997 as the economy imploded.”
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Bond and Manyama citation years disagree

    Minor

    The in-text citation gives 2003, but the corresponding reference lists 2002.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bracking S., 2008, Remittances, Poverty Reduction and Informalisation in Zimbabwe
  2. 1998, Implementing the sustainable rural livelihoods approach. Paper presented to the DfID Natural Resource Advisers' Conference
  3. CSO (Central Statistical Office), 1998, Poverty in Zimbabwe
  4. Drinkwater M., 1993, The Effects of HIV/AIDS on Agricultural Production Systems in Zambia
  5. Guijt I., 1992, RRA Notes, 15, 7
  6. Kanbur R., 2003, Q-Squared: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Poverty Appraisal
  7. Moyo S., 2009, Fast Track Land Reform: Trends and Tendencies, Report of the Baseline District Studies
  8. Mushongah, J. 2009. “Rethinking vulnerability: livelihood change in southern Zimbabwe, 1986–2006”. University of Sussex. PhD dissertation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mushongah, J., & Scoones, I.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Scoones, Ian
Venue
Journal of Development Studies
Published
2012-09
Volume
48
Issue
9
Pages
1241-1257
ISSN
  • 0022-0388 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9140
OpenAlex
W2137436063
Cited by
85
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
15.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Development Studies (publishedVersion)
  • OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African studies and sociopolitical issues
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
Keywords
livelihood change, livelihood strategies, rural households, rural development, agricultural transformation, southern Zimbabwe, wealth ranking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review