Cited by 30Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Social experience and social context alter the behavioral response to centrally administered oxytocin in female Syrian hamsters

Harmon, A.C, Moore, T.O, Huhman, K.L, Albers, H.E·2002·Neuroscience

Abstract

The type of social behavior displayed by an individual is profoundly influenced by its immediate social environment or context and its prior social experience. Although oxytocin is important in the expression of social behavior in several species, it is not known if social factors alter the ability of oxytocin to influence behavior. The purpose of the present study was to test the hypothesis that social experience and social context alter the ability of oxytocin to regulate flank marking (a form of scent marking) in female Syrian hamsters. Oxytocin was microinjected into the medial preoptic anterior hypothalamic continuum (MPOA-AH) of socially experienced, dominant female hamsters which were then tested with either a subordinate partner, with a novel partner, or alone. Oxytocin induced flank marking in a dose-dependent manner but only when the experienced dominant hamsters were tested with their familiar, subordinate partners. Oxytocin did not induce flank marking when injected into socially naive female hamsters that were tested with an opponent or alone. In males, by contrast, oxytocin induced flank marking in dominant hamsters when they were tested with their subordinate partner or alone. These data support the hypothesis that social experience and social context interact to regulate the ability of oxytocin to stimulate flank marking by its actions in the MPOA-AH in female hamsters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00523-1

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harmon, A. C., Moore, T. O., Huhman, K. L., & Albers, H. E.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Clark Atlanta University (US)
Corresponding author
Albers, H.E
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
109
Issue
4
Pages
767-772
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055266348
Cited by
30
References
19
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH62641, R01MH062641)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS37234)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
oxytocin, social experience, social environment, flank marking, scent marking, medial preoptic area, anterior hypothalamus, dominance, social behavior, sex differences
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cues, Female, Cricetinae, Anterior Hypothalamic Nucleus, Learning, Male, Mesocricetus, Oxytocin, Preoptic Area, Sex Characteristics, Social Dominance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review