Cited by 206Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Deconstructing sociality, social evolution and relevant nonapeptide functions

Goodson, James L.·2013·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Although behavioral neuroendocrinologists often discuss "sociality" as a unitary variable, the term encompasses a wide diversity of behaviors that do not evolve in a linked fashion across species. Thus grouping, monogamy, paternal care, cooperative breeding/alloparental care, and various other forms of social contact are evolutionarily labile and evolve in an almost cafeteria-like fashion, indicating that relevant neural mechanisms are at least partially dissociable. This poses a challenge for the study of the nonapeptides (vasopressin, oxytocin, and homologous neuropeptides), because nonapeptides are known to modulate all of these aspects of sociality in one species or another. Hence, we may expect substantial diversity in the behavioral functions of nonapeptides across species, and indeed this is the case. Further compounding this complexity is the fact that the pleiotropic contributions of nonapeptides to social behavior are matched by pleiotropic contributions to physiology. Given these considerations, single "model systems" approaches to nonapeptide function will likely not have strong predictive validity for humans or other species. Rather, if we are to achieve predictive validity, we must sample a wide diversity of species in an attempt to derive general principles. In the present review, I discuss what is known about functional evolution of nonapeptide systems, and critically evaluate general assumptions about bonding and other functions that are based on the model systems approach. From this analysis I attempt to summarize what can and cannot be generalized across species, and highlight critical gaps in our knowledge about the functional evolution of nonapeptide systems as it relates to dimensions of sociality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.005

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodson, J. L.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Goodson, James L.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
465-478
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009060360
Cited by
206
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
nonapeptide, vasopressin, oxytocin, sociality, social evolution, monogamy, paternal care, cooperative breeding, alloparental care, social bonding, functional evolution, model systems, cross-species generalization, pleiotropy
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Biological Evolution, Humans, Object Attachment, Oxytocin, Social Behavior, Vasopressins, Vasotocin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review