Cited by 411EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback?

Hyland, Fiona·2003·System

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0346-251x(03)00021-6

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extent of students' engagement with form-focused feedback varies greatly, and one lower-intermediate student's response to teacher feedback was strongly influenced by emotional reactions to the teacher's comments.

    “F. Hyland (2003), for example, found that the extent her two case study students engaged with form-focused feedback varied greatly, so that one lower-intermediate student's response to teacher feedback was strongly influenced by her emotional reactions to the teachers' comments on her work.”

    From Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing (2018) · cites this paper as F. Hyland (2003)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hyland, F.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Hyland, Fiona
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-06
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
217-230
ISSN
0346-251X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965566286
Cited by
411
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
FWCI
37.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • System (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Keywords
teacher feedback, student revision, academic writing, linguistic accuracy, student engagement, writing instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review