Cited by 64Subtitles and Audiovisual MediaEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of three aural advance organizers for video viewing in a foreign language classroom

Chung, J.M, Huang, S.C·1998·System

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0346-251x(98)00037-2

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chung, J. M., & Huang, S. C.
Affiliations
Minghsin University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Huang, S.C
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-12
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
553-565
ISSN
0346-251X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971709090
Cited by
64
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
System (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
video viewing, second language comprehension, EFL learners, Chinese learners of English, video captions, student motivation, warm-up duration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review