The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Cited by
Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review
De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005 · Cited by 940
NETWORK ANALYSIS OF KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION IN ASYNCHRONOUS LEARNING NETWORKS
Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2019) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v7i3.1842 · Cited by 377
Future Foreign Language Teachers' Social and Cognitive Collaboration in an Online Environment
Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2006) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44046 · Cited by 257
E‐learning: you don't always get what you hope for
Kirkwood, A. (2009) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/14759390902992576 · Cited by 149
Evaluating peer learning and assessment in online collaborative learning environments
Altınay, Z. (2017) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1232752 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Macdonald, J.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 377-391
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035553897
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 77.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0360-1315(02)00168-9
- The paper
- Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1315(02)00168-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
