Cited by 78Refrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesHeat Transfer and OptimizationHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies

Development of a microchannel evaporator model for a CO2 air-conditioning system

Kim, Man-Hoe, Bullard, Clark W·2001·Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0360-5442(01)00042-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kim, M.-H., & Bullard, C. W.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Man-Hoe
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
931-948
ISSN
0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061286638
Cited by
78
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Keywords
microchannel heat exchangers, evaporator modeling, CO2 refrigerant, mobile air conditioning, air-side heat transfer, pressure drop correlations, heat and mass transfer, wet conditions, finite volume method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review