Cited by 996Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Ghost Condensation and a Consistent IR Modification of Gravity

Open access
Hamed, N. Arkani, Cheng, H.S, Luty, M.A, Mukohyama, S·2004·Journal of High Energy Physics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/05/074

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ghost condensation model adds a scalar ghost field but theory is kept stable because terms push kinetic terms to fixed condensation value avoiding instability; theory has spontaneous breaking of Lorentz invariance.

    “Another interesting scalar–tensor theory is the ghost condensation model as proposed by Hamed et al. (2004). A scalar ghost field is added but the theory is kept stable because the terms in the action push the kinetic terms to a fixed condensation value avoiding instability. The theory has spontaneous breaking of Lorentz invariance.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hamed et al. 2004

  • In ghost condensation, gravitational fields propagating through ghost condensate scalar field acquire a mass just like particles acquire mass through Higgs field.

    “That is gravitational fields propagating through the ghost condensate scalar field acquire a mass just like particles acquire mass while propagating through the Higgs field.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hamed et al. 2004

  • Ghost condensate field fills space and is equivalent to a fluid with equation of state w=-1, thus can drive observed cosmic acceleration.

    “The ghost condensate field fills space in the universe and is equivalent to a fluid with the same equation of state, , as a cosmological constant, and thus can drive the observed cosmic acceleration.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hamed et al. 2004

  • Most frameworks explicitly break Lorentz invariance, with a preferred set of observers or background field other than the metric.

    “Most frameworks explicitly break Lorentz invariance, in that there is a preferred set of observers or background field other than the metric [90, 34].”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [34]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. D. Mattingly and T. Jacobson, Relativistic gravity with a dynamical preferred frame, gr-qc/0112012; · arXiv
  2. K. Freese and M. Lewis, Cardassian expansion: a model in which the universe is flat, matter dominated and accelerating, Phys. Lett. B 540 (2002) 1 [astro-ph/0201229]. · arXiv
  3. C. Wetterich, Cosmology with varying scales and couplings, hep-ph/0302116. · arXiv
  4. S.M. Carroll, V. Duvvuri, M. Trodden and M.S. Turner, Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational physics?, astro-ph/0306438. · arXiv
  5. J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Chameleon fields: awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space, astro-ph/0309300; · arXiv
  6. R. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C. Misner, in Gravitation: an introduction to current research, L. Witten ed., Wiley, New York 1962.
  7. J.M. Cline, S.-y. Jeon and G.D. Moore, The phantom menaced: constraints on low-energy effective ghosts, hep-ph/0311312. · arXiv
  8. C. Armendariz-Picon, T. Damour and V. Mukhanov, k-inflation, Phys. Lett. B 458 (1999) 209 [hep-th/9904075]; · arXiv
  9. D. Colladay and V.A. Kostelecky, CPT violation and the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 6760 [hep-ph/9703464]; · arXiv
  10. B.R. Heckel, E.G. Adelberger, J.H. Gundlach, M.G. Harris and H.E. Swanson, Torsion balance test of spin coupled forces, Prepared for international conference on orbis scientiae 1999: quantum gravity, generalized theory of gravitation and superstring theory based unification (28th conference on high-energy physics and cosmology since 1964), Coral Gables, Florida, 16-19 Dec 1999.
  11. F. Canè et al., Bound on Lorentz-and CPT-violating boost effects for the neutron, physics/0309070. JHEP05(2004)074 · arXiv
  12. R. Bluhm, Lorentz and CPT tests in matter and antimatter, hep-ph/0308281. · arXiv
  13. A recent overview of past work on CPT and Lorentz violations can be found in, for example, CPT and Lorentz Symmetry II, V. A. Kostelecky, ed., World Scientific, Singapore 2002.
  14. G.D. Birkhoff and R.E. Langer, Relativity and modern physics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1923.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamed, N. A., Cheng, H. S., Luty, M. A., & Mukohyama, S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2004-05-29
Volume
2004
Issue
05
Pages
074-074
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004840376
Cited by
996
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 47
FWCI
35.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0201124, 0244821)
  • Aspen Center for Physics
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
ghost condensation, modified gravity, de Sitter expansion, effective field theory, Lorentz violation, spin-dependent forces, modified Newtonian potential, antigravity, dark energy, dark matter, inflation (cosmology)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review