Cited by 125Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPregnancy and Medication Impact

Buprenorphine treatment of pregnant opioid-dependent women: maternal and neonatal outcomes

Johnson, Rolley E, Jones, Hendrée E, Jasinski, Donald R, Svikis, Dace S, Haug, Nancy A, Jansson, Lauren M, Kissin, Wendy B, Alpan, Gad +6 more·2001·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

This open-label prospective study examined maternal and neonatal safety and efficacy outcome measures during and following prenatal buprenorphine exposure. Three opioid-dependent pregnant women received 8 or 12 mg sublingual buprenorphine tablets daily for 15-16 weeks prior to delivery. Results showed that buprenorphine in combination with comprehensive prenatal care was safe and effective in these women. Prenatal exposure to buprenorphine resulted in normal birth outcomes, a mean of 4.33 days (minimum possible=4) hospitalization, and a 'relatively mild' neonatal abstinence syndrome comprised primarily of tremors (disturbed), hyperactive moro and shortened sleep after feeding. The infants required no pharmacological treatment. Onset of neonatal abstinence signs occurred within the first 12 h after birth, peaked by 72 h and returned to below pre-12 h levels by 120 h. It is concluded that buprenorphine has potential utility for the treatment of pregnant opioid-dependent women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00194-0

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, R. E., Jones, H. E., Jasinski, D. R., Svikis, D. S., Haug, N. A., Jansson, L. M., Kissin, W. B., Alpan, G., Lantz, M. E., Cone, E. J., Wilkins, D. G., Golden, A. S., Huggins, G. R., & Lester, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Jones, Hendrée E
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-06
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
97-103
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162092714
Cited by
125
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 09258, DA 07029, 2P50-DA05273-11, R01DA007029, P50DA009258, P50DA005273)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
buprenorphine, opioid use disorder, pregnancy, neonatal abstinence syndrome, maternal outcomes, neonatal outcomes, sublingual buprenorphine, prenatal care, neonatal hospitalization
MeSH terms
Adult, Buprenorphine, Female, Health Status, Humans, Infant, Narcotic Antagonists, Opioid-Related Disorders, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review