CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 115Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A proper-time cure for the conformal sickness in quantum gravity

Open access
Dasgupta, A, Loll, R·2001·Nuclear Physics B
DOI 10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00227-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00227-9

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It has been suggested that the conformal contribution is canceled by a Faddeev-Popov determinant, and preliminary supporting computations have been made in a proper time gauge.

    “This has led to a suggestion [100, 99] that the conformal contribution is canceled by a Faddeev-Popov determinant (see also [198]), and some preliminary supporting computations have been made in a proper time gauge [100].”

    From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [100]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Misner, 1957, Feynman quantization of general relativity, Rev. Mod. Phys., 29, 497, 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.497 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Leutwyler, 1964, Gravitational field: equivalence of Feynman quantization and canonical quantization, Phys. Rev., 134, B1155, 10.1103/PhysRev.134.B1155 · DOI
  3. Gibbons, 1978, Path integrals and the indefiniteness of the gravitational action, Nucl. Phys. B, 138, 141, 10.1016/0550-3213(78)90161-X · DOI · Paper page
  4. Halliwell, 1989, Steepest descent contours in the path integral approach to quantum cosmology. The de Sitter minisuperspace model, Phys. Rev. D, 39, 2206, 10.1103/PhysRevD.39.2206 · DOI
  5. Halliwell, 1989, Steepest descent contours in the path integral approach to quantum cosmology. Microsuperspace, Phys. Rev. D, 40, 1868, 10.1103/PhysRevD.40.1868 · DOI
  6. Halliwell, 1990, Steepest descent contours in the path integral approach to quantum cosmology. A general method with applications to anisotropic minisuperspace models, Phys. Rev. D, 42, 3997, 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3997 · DOI
  7. Halliwell, 1990, Integration contours for the no-boundary wave function of the universe, Phys. Rev. D, 41, 1815, 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.1815 · DOI
  8. Schleich, 1987, Conformal rotation in perturbative gravity, Phys. Rev. D, 36, 2342, 10.1103/PhysRevD.36.2342 · DOI
  9. Mazur, 1990, The path integral measure, conformal factor problem and stability of the ground state of quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B, 341, 187, 10.1016/0550-3213(90)90268-I · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ambjørn, 1998, Non-perturbative Lorentzian quantum gravity, causality and topology change, Nucl. Phys. B, 536, 407, 10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00692-0 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Ambjørn, 2000, A nonperturbative Lorentzian path integral for gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 924, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.924 · DOI · Paper page
  12. J. Ambjørn, J. Jurkiewicz, R. Loll, Dynamically triangulating Lorentzian quantum gravity, preprint Golm AEI-2001-049 · DOI
  13. Loll, 2001, Discrete Lorentzian quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl., 94, 96, 10.1016/S0920-5632(01)00957-4 · DOI
  14. Nakayama, 1994, 2-d quantum gravity in the proper time gauge, Phys. Lett. B, 325, 347, 10.1016/0370-2693(94)90023-X · DOI
  15. Ambjørn, 2001, Computer simulations of 3d Lorentzian quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl., 94, 689, 10.1016/S0920-5632(01)00878-7 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Teitelboim, 1983, Proper-time gauge in the quantum theory of gravitation, Phys. Rev. D, 28, 297, 10.1103/PhysRevD.28.297 · DOI
  17. Faddeev, 1973, Covariant quantization of the gravitational field, Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 111, 427, 10.3367/UFNr.0111.197311b.0427 · DOI
  18. Bern, 1991, General covariance of the path integral for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D, 43, 1212, 10.1103/PhysRevD.43.1212 · DOI
  19. Mottola, 1995, Functional integration over geometries, J. Math. Phys., 36, 2470, 10.1063/1.531359 · DOI
  20. DeWitt, 1967, Quantum theory of gravity. The canonical theory, Phys. Rev., 160, 1113, 10.1103/PhysRev.160.1113 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Schoen, 1984, Conformal deformation of a Riemannian metric to constant scalar curvature, J. Diff. Geom., 20, 479, 10.4310/jdg/1214439291 · DOI
  22. Distler, 1989, Conformal field theory and 2D quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B, 321, 509, 10.1016/0550-3213(89)90354-4 · DOI
  23. Mazur, 1991, Quantum gravitational measure for three-geometries, Phys. Lett. B, 262, 405, 10.1016/0370-2693(91)90613-U · DOI
  24. Polyakov, 1981, Quantum geometry of bosonic strings, Phys. Lett. B, 103, 207, 10.1016/0370-2693(81)90743-7 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Moncrief, 1989, Reduction of the Einstein equation in 2+1 dimensions to a Hamiltonian system over Teichmüller space, J. Math. Phys., 30, 2907, 10.1063/1.528475 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Seriu, 1997, Partition function for (2+1)-dimensional Einstein gravity, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 781, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.781 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dasgupta, A., & Loll, R.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Dasgupta, A
  • Loll, R
ORCID
Loll, R
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-07
Volume
606
Issue
1-2
Pages
357-379
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00227-9
OpenAlex
W2111400704
Cited by
115
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
quantum gravity, Lorentzian metric, gravitational path integral, Wick rotation, Faddeev-Popov determinant, conformal mode, renormalization, partition function, three-dimensional quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review