Cited by 468Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsStreptococcal Infections and Treatments

Risk of embolization after institution of antibiotic therapy for infective endocarditis

Open access
Vilacosta, Isidre, Graupner, Catherine, SanRomán, JoséAlberto, Sarriá, Cristina, Ronderos, Ricardo, Fernández, Cristina, Mancini, Leonardo, Sanz, Olga +2 more·2002·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives This study was designed to assess the risk of systemic embolization in patients with left-sided infective endocarditis, once adequate antibiotic treatment had been initiated, on the basis of prospective clinical follow-up.Background As one of the complications of infective endocarditis, embolization has a great impact on prognosis. Prediction of an individual patient's risk of embolization is very difficult.Methods We studied 217 episodes of left-sided endocarditis that were experienced among a cohort of 211 prospectively recruited patients. According to the Duke criteria, 91% of the episodes were definite infective endocarditis. Seventy-two episodes involved infections located on prosthetic valves. All patients were studied by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Clinical, echocardiographic and microbiologic data were entered in a data base. The mean follow-up interval was 151 days.Results Twenty-eight episodes (12.9%; group I) of endocarditis had embolic events after the initiation of antibiotic therapy. The remaining 189 episodes did not embolize (group II). Most emboli (52%) affected the central nervous system, and 65% of the embolic events occurred during the first two weeks after initiation of antibiotic therapy. Previous embolism was associated with new embolism (relative risk [RR] 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 2.93; p = 0.05). There was an increase in the risk of embolization with increasing vegetation size (RR 3.77, 95% CI 0.97 to 12.57; p = 0.07). Vegetation size had no impact on the risk of embolization in streptococcal endocarditis or aortic infection. By contrast, large (> or = 10 mm) vegetations had a higher incidence of embolism when the microorganism was staphylococcus (p = 0.04) and the mitral valve was infected (p = 0.03). The increase in vegetation size at follow-up showed a higher risk for embolization (RR 2.64, 95% CI 0.98 to 7.16; p = 0.02).Conclusions Embolism before antimicrobial therapy is a risk factor for new emboli. The risk of embolization seems to increase with increasing vegetation size, and this is particularly significant in mitral endocarditis and staphylococcal endocarditis. An increase in vegetation size, despite antimicrobial treatment, may predict later embolism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01790-4

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]3. Bardy GH, Talano JV, Reisberg B, Lesch M. Sensitivity and speci- ficity of echocardiography in a high-risk population of patients for infective endocarditis: significance of vegetation size. J Cardiovasc Ultrason 1983;2:23-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vilacosta, I., Graupner, C., SanRomán, J., Sarriá, C., Ronderos, R., Fernández, C., Mancini, L., Sanz, O., Sanmartín, J., & Stoermann, W.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES)
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES)
Corresponding author
Vilacosta, Isidre
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
39
Issue
9
Pages
1489-1495
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135673803
Cited by
468
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
Keywords
infective endocarditis, systemic embolization, left-sided endocarditis, antibiotic therapy, embolic events, vegetation size, prosthetic valve endocarditis, mitral valve infection, streptococcal endocarditis, risk factors, transesophageal echocardiography
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Aortic Valve, Embolism, Endocarditis, Bacterial, Female, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mitral Valve, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Staphylococcal Infections, Streptococcal Infections, Incidence, Prosthesis-Related Infections, Echocardiography, Transesophageal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review