Cited by 68Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Mechanism of syncope in patients with positive adenosine triphosphate tests

Open access
Donateo, Paolo, Brignole, Michele, Menozzi, Carlo, Bottoni, Nicola, Alboni, Paolo, Dinelli, Maurizio, Del Rosso, Attilio, Croci, Francesco +3 more·2003·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives We prospectively evaluated the mechanism of syncope in patients with positive adenosine triphosphate (ATP) tests (defined as the induction of atrioventricular [AV] block with a ventricular pause >/=6 s after an intravenous bolus of 20 mg ATP).Background Patients with unexplained syncope tend to have more positive ATP tests results than those without syncope.Methods An implantable loop recorder (ILR) was inserted in 36 ATP-positive patients (69 +/- 10 years; 22 women; median of 6 syncopal episodes); 15 of them also had a positive response to tilt testing.Results During the follow-up of 18 +/- 9 months, 18 patients (50%) had syncopal recurrence and 16 (44%) had an electrocardiographically documented episode: AV block (n = 3: paroxysmal in 2 and permanent in 1), AV block followed by sinus arrest (n = 1), sinus arrest (n = 5), sinus bradycardia <40 beats/min (n = 2), normal sinus rhythm (n = 2), sinus tachycardia (n = 1), rapid atrial fibrillation (n = 1), and ectopic atrial tachycardia (n = 1). Bradycardia was documented in a total of 11 cases (69%), and a long ventricular pause (4 to 29 s) was present in eight cases (50%). All three patients with ILR-documented AV block had previously had a negative tilt test, whereas seven of eight with ILR-documented sinus bradycardia or sinus arrest had previously had a positive tilt test.Conclusions In patients with adenosine-sensitive syncope, the mechanism of syncope is heterogeneous, although bradycardia is the most frequent finding. Adenosine triphosphate-induced AV block predicts AV block as the mechanism of spontaneous syncope in only a few tilt-negative patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02621-9

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiac pacing may lead to substantial reduction of syncopal attacks in elderly patients with unexplained syncope and a positive ATP test.

    “Although cardiac pacing may lead to substantial reduction of syncopal attacks in elderly patients with unexplained syncope and a positive ATP test, 229”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [229]

    The Discussion (page not specified) acknowledges a possible beneficial effect of pacing and reports that syncope recurred in 13% of paced patients with positive ATP tests in a non-controlled study. It calls the pacing results inconclusive, however, and says the apparent benefit was independent of ATP-test results. It therefore does not establish a substantial reduction specifically for elderly ATP-positive patients. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donateo, P., Brignole, M., Menozzi, C., Bottoni, N., Alboni, P., Dinelli, M., Del Rosso, A., Croci, F., Oddone, D., Solano, A., & Puggioni, E.
Affiliations
  • Presidio Ospedaliero (IT)
  • Santa Maria Nuova Hospital (IT)
Corresponding author
Brignole, Michele
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
93-98
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154605051
Cited by
68
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
syncope, atrioventricular block, sinus arrest, sinus bradycardia, ventricular pause, implantable loop recorder, tilt table test, syncope recurrence, syncope mechanism
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphate, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular, Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological, Female, Heart Block, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Syncope, Implants, Experimental

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review