Cited by 315Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersVestibular and auditory disordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

‘The Italian Protocol‘: a simplified head-up tilt testing potentiated with oral nitroglycerin to assess patients with unexplained syncope

Open access
Bartoletti, A·2000·Europace

Abstract

Head-up tilt testing potentiated by sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG), advocated by an Italian group, is a simple and safe but still not a standardized, diagnostic tool for the investigation of syncope. In fact, owing to its rapid spread, the original protocol received, often arbitrarily, many subsequent modifications. We now define the best methodology of the test on strictly evidence-based criteria as: stabilization phase of 5 min in the supine position; passive phase of 20 min at a tilt angle of 60 degrees; provocation phase of further 15 min after 400 micrograms NTG sublingual spray. Test interruption is made when the protocol is completed in the absence of symptoms, or there is occurrence of syncope, or occurrence of progressive (> 5 min) orthostatic hypotension. We intend that this protocol, named by us as 'The Italian Protocol', will be accepted as the standard methodology of the tilt test potentiated by sublingual nitrates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/eupc.2000.0125

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tilt testing was positive in 51-56% of patients with atypical clinical features suggesting a reflex mechanism.

    “Indeed, tilt testing was positive in 51-56% of patients with atypical clinical features suggesting a reflex mechanism, 106,124-128”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [106]

    The Additional information table reports 51% total tilt-test positivity in two groups of patients with unexplained syncope. It does not identify those patients as having atypical clinical features suggesting a reflex mechanism, or report a 56% positivity rate for that subgroup. The Test interruption section describes a positive response as an expression of a vasovagal reflex, but does not establish the claimed subgroup rate. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Tilt testing has an acceptable sensitivity and specificity when calculated in patients with true VVS or without a history of syncope.

    “Tilt testing has an acceptable sensitivity 124 and specificity 106,124,125 when these are calculated in patients with true VVS or without a history of syncope.”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [106]

    The Additional information tables report positive tilt tests in patients with unexplained syncope and relatively few positive tests in control subjects (18 of 230), supporting the general point about diagnostic performance. The paper does not establish sensitivity specifically in patients with confirmed, or “true,” vasovagal syncope; its patient results concern unexplained syncope. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Del Rosso A, Bartoletti A. Nitrate-stimulated test (letter). Am Heart J 1999; 137: 575-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartoletti, A.
Affiliations
Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata (IT)
Corresponding author
Bartoletti, A
Venue
Europace
Published
2000-10
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
339-342
ISSN
1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128037753
Cited by
315
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
head-up tilt, sublingual nitroglycerin, syncope, orthostatic hypotension, orthostatic intolerance
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Female, Nitroglycerin, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Syncope, Vasodilator Agents, Tilt-Table Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review