Cited by 17ECG Monitoring and AnalysisPotassium and Related DisordersCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

NON-INVASIVE DETECTION OF HYPERKALEMIA WITH A SMARTPHONE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Open access
Galloway, Conner D., Valys, Alexander V., Petterson, Frank L., Gundotra, Vivek P., Treiman, Daniel L., Albert, David E., Dillon, John J., Attia, Zachi I. +1 more·2018·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(18)30813-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galloway, C. D., Valys, A. V., Petterson, F. L., Gundotra, V. P., Treiman, D. L., Albert, D. E., Dillon, J. J., Attia, Z. I., & Friedman, P. A.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
71
Issue
11
Pages
A272
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792902933
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Potassium and Related Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
hyperkalemia, non-invasive detection, artificial intelligence, electrocardiographic changes, arrhythmia risk, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review