Cited by 62Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringWireless Body Area Networks

The Opportunity and Obstacles for Smartwatches and Wearable Sensors

Foster, Kenneth R., Torous, John·2019·IEEE Pulse

Abstract

In September 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) made a striking announcement. Transforming its current regulatory practice for approving and certifying medical devices-the FDA announced a bold new plan, the Digital Health Software Precertification (Precert) Program, to offer an entirely new regulatory model to assess smartphone apps, wearables, sensors, and software. This transformation and medicalization of the consumer health market present both opportunities and obstacles, by opening up large markets for health monitoring and diagnosis using inexpensive mass-market, off-the-shelf devices. It also raises challenges, both related to privacy and effective uses of the devices to promote health. The Fitbit and Apple Watch are examples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mpuls.2018.2885832

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many studies have focused on novel technologies, presenting prototypes, or investigating feasibility and acceptance of a wearable device in a specific setting.

    “Many studies have focused on novel technologies, presenting prototypes, or investigating the feasibility and acceptance of a wearable device in a specific setting [3,27].”
  • These vital signs and device types seem to become the standard in wearable research.

    “These vital signs and device types seem to become the standard in wearable research [3,27,31,224,225].”
  • Similar to other reviews, most devices were wrist-worn fitness trackers and accelerometers, and most were from Fitbit, measuring PA, HR, and sleep.

    “Similar to other reviews, most devices were wrist-worn fitness trackers and accelerometers, and most of them are from the company Fitbit, measuring PA, HR, and sleep [3,27,31,224,225].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foster, K. R., & Torous, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
IEEE Pulse
Published
2019-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
22-25
ISSN
  • 2154-2287 (ISSN-L)
  • 2154-2317
OpenAlex
W2921475356
Cited by
62
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5
FWCI
13.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Pulse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
smartwatches, wearable sensors, FDA regulation, medical device regulation, consumer health technology, health monitoring, patient privacy, mobile health apps, Apple Watch, Fitbit
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Fitness Trackers, Health Promotion, Humans, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review