Cited by 150Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac tumors and thrombiCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Left atrial appendage ‘stunning’ after electrical cardioversion of atrial flutter: an attenuated response compared with atrial fibrillation as the mechanism for lower susceptibility to thromboembolic events

Open access
Grimm, Richard A, Stewart, William J, Arheart, Kristopher L, Thomas, James D, Klein, Allan L·1997·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to determine whether left atrial appendage stunning occurs in patients with atrial flutter and to compare left atrial appendage function in the pericardioversion period with that in patients with atrial fibrillation.Background Left atrial appendage stunning has recently been proposed as a key mechanistic phenomenon in the etiology of postcardioversion thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation. Atrial flutter is thought to be associated with a negligible risk of thromboembolic events; therefore, anticoagulation is commonly withheld before and after cardioversion in these patients.Methods Sixty-three patients with atrial flutter (n = 19) or atrial fibrillation (n = 44) underwent transesophageal echocardiography immediately before and after electrical cardioversion. In addition to assessing the presence of thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast, we measured left atrial appendage emptying velocity and calculated shear rates by pulsed wave Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography.Results Patients with atrial flutter exhibited greater left atrial appendage flow velocities before cardioversion than those with atrial fibrillation (42 +/- 19 vs. 28 +/- 15 cm/s [mean +/- SD], p < 0.001). Left atrial appendage shear rates were also higher in patients with atrial flutter (103 +/- 82 vs. 59 +/- 37 s-1, p < 0.001). After cardioversion, left atrial appendage flow velocities decreased compared with precardioversion values in patients with atrial fibrillation (28 +/- 15 before to 15 +/- 14 cm/s after cardioversion, p < 0.001) and atrial flutter (42 +/- 19 to 27 +/- 18 cm/s, respectively, p < 0.001). Shear rates decreased from 59 +/- 37 before cardioversion to 30 +/- 31 s-1 after cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (p < 0.001), and from 103 +/- 82 s to 65 +/- 52 s-1, respectively (p < 0.001), in atrial flutter. This decrease in flow velocity from before to after cardioversion occurred in 36 (82%) of 44 patients with atrial fibrillation and 14 (74%) of 19 with atrial flutter. The impaired left atrial appendage function after cardioversion was less pronounced in the group with atrial flutter (27 +/- 18 cm/s for atrial flutter vs. 15 +/- 14 cm/s for atrial fibrillation, p < 0.001). New or increased spontaneous echo contrast occurred in 22 (50%) of 44 patients with atrial fibrillation versus 4 (21%) of 19 with atrial flutter (p < 0.05).Conclusions Left atrial appendage stunning also occurs in patients with atrial flutter, although to a lesser degree than in those with atrial fibrillation. These data suggest that patients with atrial flutter are at risk for thromboembolic events after cardioversion, although this risk is most likely lower than that in patients with atrial fibrillation because of better preserved left atrial appendage function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00551-7

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Grimm RA, Stewart WJ, Maloney JD, et al. Impact of electrical cardiover- sion of atrial fibrillation on left atrial appendage function and smoke: characterization by simultaneous transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1359 -66.
  2. Jenson JB, Humphries JD, Kouwenhoven WB, Eng DE, Jude JR. Electro- shock for atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. JAMA 1965;194:1181-4.
  3. Grimm RA, Leung DY, Black IW, et al. Evidence for left atrial appendage "stunning" following spontaneous conversion from atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm vindicating electrical cardioversion as the sole etiology: a transesoph- ageal Doppler echocardiographic study. Am Heart J 1995;130:174 -6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grimm, R. A., Stewart, W. J., Arheart, K. L., Thomas, J. D., & Klein, A. L.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Grimm, Richard A
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-03
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
582-589
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073015884
Cited by
150
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac tumors and thrombi
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, electrical cardioversion, thromboembolism, left atrial appendage emptying velocity, shear rate, spontaneous echo contrast, transesophageal echocardiography, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage function, thromboembolic risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Coronary Thrombosis, Electric Countershock, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Echocardiography, Doppler, Atrial Function, Left, Echocardiography, Transesophageal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review