Cited by 72Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications

Atrial flutter and thromboembolic risk: a systematic review

Vadmann, Henrik, Nielsen, Peter Brønnum, Hjortshøj, Søren Pihlkjær, Riahi, Sam, Rasmussen, Lars Hvilsted, Lip, Gregory Y H, Larsen, Torben Bjerregaard·2015·Heart

Abstract

Atrial flutter confers a thromboembolic risk, but contrary to atrial fibrillation the relationship has only been addressed in few studies. This study performs an up to date systematic review of the literature to investigate the association between atrial flutter and thromboembolic events. Articles were found by MEDLINE, EMBASE search and a manual search of references list in included articles. International guidelines, meta-analyses, reviews, case reports, studies reporting thromboembolic events in relation to ablation, or cardioversion procedures, echocardiography, and observational studies were found eligible in this review. A total of 52 articles were included in this review. During cardioversion, thromboembolic event rates varied from 0% to 6% with a follow-up from 1 week to 6 years. Echocardiographic studies reported prevalence of thrombus material from 0% to 38% and a prevalence of spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) from 21% to 28%. One ablation study in non-anticoagulated patients reported thromboembolic events at 13.9%. Observational studies reported an overall elevated stroke risk (risk ratio 1.4, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.46) and mortality risk (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.1) with long time follow-up compared with a control group in both studies. Given the limitations and heterogeneity of the data, a meta-analysis was not a part of this systematic review. Notwithstanding the limitations of observational studies and indirect data from echocardiographic studies, this systematic review confirms that clinical thromboembolic events, left atrial thrombus and SEC are highly prevalent in atrial flutter.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307550

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vadmann, H., Nielsen, P. B., Hjortshøj, S. P., Riahi, S., Rasmussen, L. H., Lip, G. Y. H., & Larsen, T. B.
Affiliations
  • Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
  • Aalborg University (DK)
  • Birmingham City Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Larsen, Torben Bjerregaard
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-07-06
Volume
101
Issue
18
Pages
1446-1455
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W1914705848
Cited by
72
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Keywords
atrial flutter, thromboembolic risk, stroke, cardioversion, catheter ablation, left atrial thrombus, spontaneous echo contrast, mortality, anticoagulation
MeSH terms
Anticoagulants, Atrial Flutter, Echocardiography, Electric Countershock, Humans, Thromboembolism, Catheter Ablation, Risk Assessment, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review