Cited by 225ERP Systems Implementation and ImpactInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

The dynamics of factors affecting the adoption of innovations

Waarts, Eric, van Everdingen, Yvonne M., van Hillegersberg, Jos·2002·Journal of Product Innovation Management

Abstract

An abundance of IT innovations are constantly struggling for market acceptance. Various models have been proposed in the literature in order to aid understanding of the principles behind the adoption of IT innovations, but most of them implicitly assume that the factors explaining adoption decisions do not change over time. This study challenges that assumption and adds to the existing literature by investigating the dynamics of the factors influencing adoption. Our general proposition is that the driving factors in adopting innovations will change as the diffusion of the innovation in the market progresses. A large-scale empirical study was carried out among medium-sized companies in a variety of European countries and industries concerning the adoption of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software. The findings strongly indicate that the factors affecting late adoption of ERP differ significantly from the factors explaining early adoption. At early stages of the diffusion process adoption tends to be especially driven by a combination of internal strategic drives and attitudes of the firm together with external forces like industry competition and supplier activities. Later on, the mix of adoption stimulating factors seems to be focusing more on implementation issues such as the scalability of the system, the number of seats and the yearly available budget. The study leads to both new methodological insights and substantive conclusions that also have practical implications…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1540-5885.1960412

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A significant number of ERP vendors principally targets large enterprises.

    “significant number of vendors principally targets large enterprises (Kumar & van Hillegersberg, 2000;Waarts, van Everdingen, & van Hillegersberg, 2002).”

    From Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution (2016) · cites this paper as Waarts, van Everdingen, & van Hillegersberg, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waarts, E., van Everdingen, Y. M., & van Hillegersberg, J.
Affiliations
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Waarts, Eric
Venue
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-11
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
412-423
ISSN
  • 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5885
OpenAlex
W2009998833
Cited by
225
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Product Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
technology adoption, diffusion of innovations, enterprise resource planning, ERP software, adoption dynamics, medium-sized enterprises, industry competition, supplier influence, system scalability, implementation costs, strategic drivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review