The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,281
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249688 · Cited by 6,553
O’connor, B. P. (2000) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03200807 · Cited by 4,116
Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.99.3.432 · Cited by 3,129
Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making.
Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.56.3.407 · Cited by 1,555
Cited by
Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007 · Cited by 2,726
E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study
Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001 · Cited by 639
Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: a structural equation model
Wu, J.-H., Wang, S.-C., & Lin, L.-M. (2007) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.006 · Cited by 603
Liaw, S.-S., & Huang, H.-M. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015 · Cited by 571
Elderly persons’ perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare
Steele, R., Lo, A., Secombe, C., & Wong, Y. K. (2009) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.001 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Barbeite, F. G., & Weiss, E. M.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155828420
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 17.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0747-5632(03)00049-9
- The paper
- Barbeite, F. G., & Weiss, E. M. (2004). Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0747-5632(03)00049-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
