The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation
Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003 · Cited by 654
Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review
Wagner, M., & Watson, D. G. (2010) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690961003589492 · Cited by 425
The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure
(2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.001.0001 · Cited by 423
Anticipatory effects of intonation: Eye movements during instructed visual search
Ito, K., & Speer, S. R. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.013 · Cited by 414
Metzing, C. (2003) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00028-7 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chambers, C. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 292-314
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066789554
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00001-3
- The paper
- Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chambers, C. G. (2002). Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00001-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
