The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: the processing of German WH-questions
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures
Chomsky, N. (1993) · Mouton eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110884166 · Cited by 8,541
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
Lectures on Government and Binding
Williams, E., & Chomsky, N. (1984) · Language · doi:10.2307/413646 · Cited by 5,136
On Methods in the Analysis of Profile Data
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289823 · Cited by 4,937
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies
Gibson, E. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1 · Cited by 2,537
The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research
Clark, H. H. (1973) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(73)80014-3 · Cited by 2,222
Cairns, H. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996) · Language · doi:10.2307/416113 · Cited by 1,920
Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(92)90039-z · Cited by 1,856
Cited by
Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055 · Cited by 625
Bornkessel, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.4.787 · Cited by 622
Self-citationElectrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences
Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00086-7 · Cited by 469
ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies
Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Abada, S. H. (2005) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.012 · Cited by 444
Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing
Grodzinsky, Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2006) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.007 · Cited by 438
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 250-272
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064451174
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: the processing of German WH-questions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00004-9
- The paper
- Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: the processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00004-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
