Cited by 250Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsMathematics Education and PedagogyMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 137 of the 154 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups

Webb, Noreen M., Mastergeorge, Ann·2003·International Journal of Educational Research

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0883-0355(03)00074-0

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 154 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Awbrey, M. (1992). History–Social Science Group Assessment in California (High School Level). Paper presented at the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing's conference on what works in performance assessment, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, September.
  2. Bossert, 1988, Cooperative activities in the classroom, Review of Research in Education, 15, 225
  3. Lomask, M., Baron, J., Greigh, J., & Harrison, C. (1992). ConnMap: Connecticut's use of concept mapping to assess the structure of students’ knowledge of science. A symposium presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Cambridge, MA, March.
  4. Mathematical Sciences Education Board, National Research Council (1993). Measuring up: Prototypes for mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  5. Meece, 1991, The classroom context and students’ motivational goals, Vol. 7, 261
  6. Mehan, 1985, The structure of classroom discourse, Vol. 3, 119
  7. Mevarech, 1997, IMPROVE, American Educational Research Journal, 34, 365, 10.2307/1163362 · DOI
  8. National Research Council (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation of the future of mathematics education. Mathematical Sciences Education Board, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  9. National Research Council (1993). Measuring up: Prototypes for mathematics assessment. Mathematical Sciences Education Board, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  10. Nelson-Le Gall, 1983, Instrumental help-seeking and everyday problem-solving, Vol. 2, 265
  11. Neuberger, W. (1993). Making group assessments fair measures of students’ abilities. Paper presented at the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing's conference on assessment questions: Equity answers, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, September.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 250

Metadata

Authors
Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Webb, Noreen M.
Venue
International Journal of Educational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
39
Issue
1-2
Pages
73-97
ISSN
0883-0355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017001529
Cited by
250
References
154
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Keywords
helping behavior, cooperative learning, help-seeking, help-giving, mathematics learning, junior high school students, teacher role, constructivism, Vygotskian learning, student questioning, classroom climate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review