The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reading and language in 9- to 12-year olds prenatally exposed to cigarettes and marijuana
Abstract
Facets of reading and language were examined in 131 9- to 12-year-old children for whom prenatal exposure to marijuana and cigarettes had been ascertained. The subjects were from a low-risk, predominantly middle class sample who are participants in an ongoing longitudinal study. Discriminant Function Analysis revealed a dose-dependent association that remained after controlling for potential confounds, between prenatal cigarette exposure and lower language and lower reading scores, particularly on auditory-related aspects of this latter measure. The findings are interpreted as consistent with earlier observations of an association between cigarette smoking during pregnancy and altered auditory functioning in the offspring. Similarities and differences between the reading observations and dyslexia are discussed. Maternal prenatal passive smoke exposure did not appear to contribute to either the language or reading outcomes at this age but postnatal secondhand smoke exposure by the child was associated with poorer language scores. Prenatal marijuana exposure was not significantly related to either the reading or language outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, central processing of auditory stimuli appears to be highly sensitive to disruption by gestational tobacco exposure.”
From Impaired auditory discrimination learning following perinatal nicotine exposure or β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit deletion (2012) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-2400 · Cited by 6,118
Bayley Scales of Infant Development
(2007) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412952644.n48 · Cited by 4,242
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children
Miles-Mason, E. (2018) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483392271.n537 · Cited by 4,133
Psychological Assessment Resources
Abidin, R. R. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,141
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
(1977) · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10517-x · Cited by 2,457
Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education.
Smith, H., & Ferguson, G. A. (1967) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2283699 · Cited by 2,221
A METHOD FOR JUDGING ALL CONTRASTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE *
Scheffé, H. (1953) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/40.1-2.87 · Cited by 1,954
What I Think and Feel: A Revised Measure of Children's Manifest Anxiety
Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1997) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1023/a:1025751206600 · Cited by 1,946
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prenatal Substance Abuse: Short- and Long-term Effects on the Exposed Fetus
Behnke, M., Smith, V. C., Behnke, M., Smith, V. C., Levy, S., Ammerman, S. D., Gonzalez, P. K., Ryan, S. A., Smith, V. C., Wunsch, M. J., et al. (2013) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3931 · Cited by 603
The Effects of Tobacco Smoke and Nicotine on Cognition and the Brain
Swan, G. E., & Lessov‐Schlaggar, C. N. (2007) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-007-9035-9 · Cited by 605
Fried, P. A., Watkinson, B., & Gray, R. (2003) · Neurotoxicology and Teratology · doi:10.1016/s0892-0362(03)00029-1 · Cited by 458
Self-citationExposure to environmental tobacco smoke and cognitive abilities among u.S. Children and adolescents
Yolton, K., Dietrich, K., Auinger, P., Lanphear, B. P., & Hornung, R. (2005) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7210 · Cited by 331
Committee Opinion No. 722: Marijuana Use During Pregnancy and Lactation
(2017) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002354 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Fried, P. A., Watkinson, B., & Siegel, L. S.
- Affiliations
- Carleton University (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Fried, Peter A.
- Venue
- Neurotoxicology and Teratology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 171-183
- ISSN
- 0892-0362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094620176
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurotoxicology and Teratology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Keywords
- prenatal cannabis exposure, reading skills, language development, auditory processing, passive smoking, dyslexia, smoking during pregnancy, children aged 9-12
- MeSH terms
- Child, Cognition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Language Development, Marijuana Smoking, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Prospective Studies, Reading, Smoking, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
