The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1
GREENLAND, S. (1987) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036298 · Cited by 1,644
Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated
Thompson, S. G. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6965.1351 · Cited by 1,017
Preoperative Radiotherapy for Resectable Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
Cammà, C., Giunta, M., Fiorica, F., Pagliaro, L., Craxì, A., & Cottone, M. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.8.1008 · Cited by 754
Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: a comparative study
Smith, T. C., Spiegelhalter, D. J., & Thomas, A. (1995) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780142408 · Cited by 568
Cited by
How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?
Thompson, S. G., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1187 · Cited by 3,026
Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting
Riley, R. D., Lambert, P. C., & Abo-Zaid, G. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c221 · Cited by 1,701
Self-citationKarlas, T., Petroff, D., Sasso, M., Fan, J.-G., Mi, Y.-Q., de Lédinghen, V., Kumar, M., Lupsor-Platon, M., Han, K.-H., Cardoso, A. C., et al. (2017) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2016.12.022 · Cited by 1,275
Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets
Curran, P. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2009) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0015914 · Cited by 867
Thangaratinam, S., Rogozinska, E., Jolly, K., Glinkowski, S., Roseboom, T., Tomlinson, J. W., Kunz, R., Mol, B. W., Coomarasamy, A., & Khan, K. S. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e2088 · Cited by 802
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambert, P. C., Sutton, A. J., Abrams, K. R., & Jones, D. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-94
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075711546
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00414-0
- The paper
- Lambert, P. C., Sutton, A. J., Abrams, K. R., & Jones, D. R. (2002). A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00414-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
