Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Society can avoid potential environmental catastrophes while achieving sustainable growth.
“Thus the society can avoid potential environmental catastrophes while achieving sustainable growth (Torras and Boyce, 1998, Panayotou, 1997, Bhattarai and Hammig, 2001and Bhattarai and Hammig, 2004).”
From Transition in environmental governance in the Brazilian Amazon: emergence of a new pattern of socio-economic development and deforestation (2016) · cites this paper as Torras and Boyce, 1998
Cites
Economic growth and the environment
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118443 · Cited by 9,901 · see citing works
Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets Curve for air pollution emissions?
Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1994.1031 · Cited by 2,850 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve
Stern, D. I. (2004) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004 · Cited by 4,013 · see citing works
ICT and environmental sustainability: A global perspective
Añón Higón, D., Gholami, R., & Shirazi, F. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.001 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Caviglia-Harris, J. L., Chambers, D., & Kahn, J. R. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.006 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Cushing, L., Morello-Frosch, R., Wander, M., & Pastor, M. (2015) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122646 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Tritsch, I., & Arvor, D. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.018 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Torras, M., & Boyce, J. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Corresponding author
- Boyce, James K
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-160
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980533847
- Cited by
- 1,326
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 34.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Economics (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Keywords
- environmental Kuznets curve, income and environmental quality, inequality, air quality, water quality, distribution of power, political rights, civil liberties, literacy, low-income countries, environmental policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review